Young people's use of e-cigarettes in Wales, England and Scotland before and after introduction of EU Tobacco Products Directive regulations: a mixed-method natural experimental evaluation

Graham Moore, Rachel Brown, Nicholas Page, Britt Hallingberg, Olivia Maynard, Jennifer McKell, Linsay Gray, Anna Blackwell, Emily Lowthian, Marcus Munafò, Anne Marie Mackintosh, Linda Bauld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: Young people's experimentation with e-cigarettes has increased in recent years, although regular use remains limited. EU Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) regulations introduced packet warnings, advertising restrictions, and regulated nicotine strength from 2016, in part due to concerns regarding use by young people. This paper examines e-cigarette use trajectories before and after TPD. Methods: E-cigarette use data were obtained from School Health Research Network/Health Behaviour in School-aged Children surveys in Wales and Smoking Drinking and Drug Use surveys in England. Data from Wales were analysed using segmented logistic regression, with before and after regression analyses of English data. Semi-structured group interviews included young people aged 14-16 years in Wales, England and Scotland in 2017 and 2018. Results: In Wales, ever use of e-cigarettes increased over time, but under a range of assumptions, growth did not appear to continue post-TPD. A small and non-significant change in trend was observed post-implementation (OR=0.96; 95%CI=0.91 to 1.01), which increased in size and significance after adjusting for ever smoking (OR=0.93; 95%CI=0.88 to 0.98). There was little increase in regular e-cigarette use from 2015 to 2017 in Wales. However, ever and regular use increased from 2014 to 2016 in England. Young people in all nations described limited interactions with components of TPD, while describing e-cigarette use as a ‘fad’, which had begun to run its course. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that young people's e-cigarette experimentation may be plateauing in UK nations. The extent to which this arises from regulatory changes, or due to a fad having begun to lose its appeal among young people in the UK countries, remains unclear. These trends contrast to those observed in North America, where newer products whose EU market entry and marketing have been impacted by TPD, have gained traction among young people. Long-term monitoring of e-cigarette use trends and perceptions among young people remain vital.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102795
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume85
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research ( NIHR ) in England under its Public Health Research Board (grant number 16/57/01). The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Health Service (NHS), NIHR or the Department of Health for England. This work was also undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UKCRC, is gratefully acknowledged. The School Health Research Network is a partnership between DECIPHer at Cardiff University, Welsh Government, Public Health Wales and Cancer Research UK, funded by Health and Care Research Wales via the National Centre for Health and Wellbeing Research. LG acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council and the Chief Scientist Office (MC_ UU _12017/13) of the Scottish Government Health Care Directorates (SPHSU13). In addition, the authors would like to thank Laurence Moore, Douglas Eadie, and Jordan Van Godwin for their contributions to this study, and Chris Roberts for supplying the HBSC data for Wales.

Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in England under its Public Health Research Board (grant number 16/57/01). The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Health Service (NHS), NIHR or the Department of Health for England. This work was also undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UKCRC, is gratefully acknowledged. The School Health Research Network is a partnership between DECIPHer at Cardiff University, Welsh Government, Public Health Wales and Cancer Research UK, funded by Health and Care Research Wales via the National Centre for Health and Wellbeing Research. LG acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council and the Chief Scientist Office (MC_UU_12017/13) of the Scottish Government Health Care Directorates (SPHSU13). In addition, the authors would like to thank Laurence Moore, Douglas Eadie, and Jordan Van Godwin for their contributions to this study, and Chris Roberts for supplying the HBSC data for Wales.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research ( NIHR ) in England under its Public Health Research Board (grant number 16/57/01). The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Health Service (NHS), NIHR or the Department of Health for England. This work was also undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UKCRC, is gratefully acknowledged. The School Health Research Network is a partnership between DECIPHer at Cardiff University, Welsh Government, Public Health Wales and Cancer Research UK, funded by Health and Care Research Wales via the National Centre for Health and Wellbeing Research. LG acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council and the Chief Scientist Office (MC_ UU _12017/13) of the Scottish Government Health Care Directorates (SPHSU13). In addition, the authors would like to thank Laurence Moore, Douglas Eadie, and Jordan Van Godwin for their contributions to this study, and Chris Roberts for supplying the HBSC data for Wales. This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in England under its Public Health Research Board (grant number 16/57/01). The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Health Service (NHS), NIHR or the Department of Health for England. This work was also undertaken with the support of The Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence. Joint funding (MR/KO232331/1) from the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the Welsh Government and the Wellcome Trust, under the auspices of the UKCRC, is gratefully acknowledged. The School Health Research Network is a partnership between DECIPHer at Cardiff University, Welsh Government, Public Health Wales and Cancer Research UK, funded by Health and Care Research Wales via the National Centre for Health and Wellbeing Research. LG acknowledges support from the Medical Research Council and the Chief Scientist Office (MC_UU_12017/13) of the Scottish Government Health Care Directorates (SPHSU13). In addition, the authors would like to thank Laurence Moore, Douglas Eadie, and Jordan Van Godwin for their contributions to this study, and Chris Roberts for supplying the HBSC data for Wales.

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • E-cigarette
  • Interrupted time series analysis
  • Mixed methods
  • Policy
  • Tobacco

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Young people's use of e-cigarettes in Wales, England and Scotland before and after introduction of EU Tobacco Products Directive regulations: a mixed-method natural experimental evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this