Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Young people’s data governance preferences for their mental health data: MindKind Study findings from India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom

  • The MindKind Consortium
  • Sage Bionetworks
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Washington
  • University of Cambridge
  • Indian Law Society
  • Walter Sisulu University
  • Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
  • Activate Change Drivers ZA
  • University of Johannesburg
  • University of California San Francisco
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust
  • Stellenbosch University
  • Higher Health
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • John Hopkins University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Mobile devices offer a scalable opportunity to collect longitudinal data that facilitate advances in mental health treatment to address the burden of mental health conditions in young people. Sharing these data with the research community is critical to gaining maximal value from rich data of this nature. However, the highly personal nature of the data necessitates understanding the conditions under which young people are willing to share them. To answer this question, we developed the MindKind Study, a multinational, mixed methods study that solicits young people’s preferences for how their data are governed and quantifies potential participants’ willingness to join under different conditions. We employed a community-based participatory approach, involving young people as stakeholders and co-researchers. At sites in India, South Africa, and the UK, we enrolled 3575 participants ages 16–24 in the mobile app-mediated quantitative study and 143 participants in the public deliberation-based qualitative study. We found that while youth participants have strong preferences for data governance, these preferences did not translate into (un)willingness to join the smartphone-based study. Participants grappled with the risks and benefits of participation as well as their desire that the “right people” access their data. Throughout the study, we recognized young people’s commitment to finding solutions and co-producing research architectures to allow for more open sharing of mental health data to accelerate and derive maximal benefit from research.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0279857
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The MindKind Study was commissioned by the Mental Health Priority Area at Wellcome Trust (https://wellcome.org/) from Sage Bionetworks (LMM and MD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement:
Data from the quantitative arm are available through Synapse (www.synapse.org/MindKind). This includes the Participant preferences (https://doi.org/10.7303/syn51225257), Participant acceptability (https://
doi.org/10.7303/syn51225253) and Participant votes (https://doi.org/10.7303/syn51225260) data.
Code for the enrollment website is available through Github (https://github.com/SageBionetworks/GlobalMentalHealthDatabank).
Extended quotes from the qualitative arm are available in the Supporting Results. The materials used to inform participants prior to public deliberation sessions are available at https://doi.org/10.7303/syn35371551.

Funding

The MindKind Study was commissioned by the Mental Health Priority Area at Wellcome Trust (https://wellcome.org/) from Sage Bionetworks (LMM and MD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Young people’s data governance preferences for their mental health data: MindKind Study findings from India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this