Writing responsibly

narrative fiction and organization studies

Carl Rhodes, Andrew D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilise distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors? Opposing the view that using fiction necessarily leads to an ‘anything goes’ relativism, we argue that a recognition of the fictionality of research texts implies a heightened sense of researcher-author responsibility. We see our main contribution as extending existing discussions of reflexivity in research into a consideration of issues of ethics and responsibility as it relates to the textuality of research writing. To do so we draw on Derrida’s theorisation of responsibility and undecidability as a way of problematising and discussing the ethics of research in relation to its textuality. We argue that the explicit borrowing from fictional genres evinces the essentially ‘written’ and fictional status of research papers, and highlights the ethical dimensions associated with decisions related to representational strategies and authorial subjectivity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-529
Number of pages25
JournalOrganization
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Organization studies
Responsibility
Borrowing
Subjectivity
Reflexivity
Relativism

Cite this

Writing responsibly : narrative fiction and organization studies. / Rhodes, Carl; Brown, Andrew D.

In: Organization, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2005, p. 505-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8bd9f8f590ed47d2862b6fcf77cca2a0,
title = "Writing responsibly: narrative fiction and organization studies",
abstract = "In this paper we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilise distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors? Opposing the view that using fiction necessarily leads to an ‘anything goes’ relativism, we argue that a recognition of the fictionality of research texts implies a heightened sense of researcher-author responsibility. We see our main contribution as extending existing discussions of reflexivity in research into a consideration of issues of ethics and responsibility as it relates to the textuality of research writing. To do so we draw on Derrida’s theorisation of responsibility and undecidability as a way of problematising and discussing the ethics of research in relation to its textuality. We argue that the explicit borrowing from fictional genres evinces the essentially ‘written’ and fictional status of research papers, and highlights the ethical dimensions associated with decisions related to representational strategies and authorial subjectivity.",
author = "Carl Rhodes and Brown, {Andrew D.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1177/1350508405052757",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "505--529",
journal = "Organization",
issn = "1350-5084",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Writing responsibly

T2 - narrative fiction and organization studies

AU - Rhodes, Carl

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In this paper we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilise distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors? Opposing the view that using fiction necessarily leads to an ‘anything goes’ relativism, we argue that a recognition of the fictionality of research texts implies a heightened sense of researcher-author responsibility. We see our main contribution as extending existing discussions of reflexivity in research into a consideration of issues of ethics and responsibility as it relates to the textuality of research writing. To do so we draw on Derrida’s theorisation of responsibility and undecidability as a way of problematising and discussing the ethics of research in relation to its textuality. We argue that the explicit borrowing from fictional genres evinces the essentially ‘written’ and fictional status of research papers, and highlights the ethical dimensions associated with decisions related to representational strategies and authorial subjectivity.

AB - In this paper we reflect on the use of fictional source material and fictional formats in organization studies in order to explore issues of responsibility in the writing of research. We start by examining how research using fictional narrative methods has worked to radically destabilise distinctions between what is real and what is fictional. In relation to this we ask the question: if a research account can be regarded as fiction, what are the implications of this insight for the responsibilities of authors? Opposing the view that using fiction necessarily leads to an ‘anything goes’ relativism, we argue that a recognition of the fictionality of research texts implies a heightened sense of researcher-author responsibility. We see our main contribution as extending existing discussions of reflexivity in research into a consideration of issues of ethics and responsibility as it relates to the textuality of research writing. To do so we draw on Derrida’s theorisation of responsibility and undecidability as a way of problematising and discussing the ethics of research in relation to its textuality. We argue that the explicit borrowing from fictional genres evinces the essentially ‘written’ and fictional status of research papers, and highlights the ethical dimensions associated with decisions related to representational strategies and authorial subjectivity.

UR - http://org.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/4/467

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508405052757

U2 - 10.1177/1350508405052757

DO - 10.1177/1350508405052757

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 505

EP - 529

JO - Organization

JF - Organization

SN - 1350-5084

IS - 4

ER -