Would Biden’s Moral Interventionism Be Good for Peace in Korea?: Here's what some of the data suggests.

Timo Kivimäki

Would Biden’s Moral Interventionism Be Good for Peace in Korea? Here's what some of the data suggests.

Politics, Languages & International Studies

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

Abstract

This article uses Uppsala University's Georeferenced Event Database data on the development of conflict fatalities in countries that US had intervened during the Obama-Biden and Trump period. It concludes that the normative interventionism of Obama-Biden administration has initiated and escalated conflict in general and specifically in countries like North Korea, while the more realistic, even if selfish nationalism of Trump administration has de-escalated conflict violence.

Original language	English
Specialist publication	The National Interest
Publication status	Published - 18 Aug 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/korea-watch/would-biden%E2%80%99s-moral-interventionism-be-good-peace-korea-167368Licence: Unspecified

1 Finished

Terror, Authoritarian Violence and Cosmopolitan Protection
Kivimaki, T. (PI)
1/09/15 → 30/06/21
Project: Other

Coding of US Presidential discourse on protection
Kivimäki, T. (Creator), University of Bath, 25 Jan 2019
DOI: 10.15125/BATH-00535
Dataset

Cite this

@misc{903d7e6c1f3e436780b3a8b730f27af1,

title = "Would Biden{\textquoteright}s Moral Interventionism Be Good for Peace in Korea?: Here's what some of the data suggests.",

abstract = "This article uses Uppsala University's Georeferenced Event Database data on the development of conflict fatalities in countries that US had intervened during the Obama-Biden and Trump period. It concludes that the normative interventionism of Obama-Biden administration has initiated and escalated conflict in general and specifically in countries like North Korea, while the more realistic, even if selfish nationalism of Trump administration has de-escalated conflict violence. ",

author = "Timo Kivim{\"a}ki",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

day = "18",

language = "English",

journal = "The National Interest",

issn = "0884-9382",

publisher = "National Interest",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Would Biden’s Moral Interventionism Be Good for Peace in Korea?

T2 - Here's what some of the data suggests.

AU - Kivimäki, Timo

PY - 2020/8/18

Y1 - 2020/8/18

N2 - This article uses Uppsala University's Georeferenced Event Database data on the development of conflict fatalities in countries that US had intervened during the Obama-Biden and Trump period. It concludes that the normative interventionism of Obama-Biden administration has initiated and escalated conflict in general and specifically in countries like North Korea, while the more realistic, even if selfish nationalism of Trump administration has de-escalated conflict violence.

AB - This article uses Uppsala University's Georeferenced Event Database data on the development of conflict fatalities in countries that US had intervened during the Obama-Biden and Trump period. It concludes that the normative interventionism of Obama-Biden administration has initiated and escalated conflict in general and specifically in countries like North Korea, while the more realistic, even if selfish nationalism of Trump administration has de-escalated conflict violence.

M3 - Article

SN - 0884-9382

JO - The National Interest

JF - The National Interest

ER -

Would Biden’s Moral Interventionism Be Good for Peace in Korea? Here's what some of the data suggests.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Terror, Authoritarian Violence and Cosmopolitan Protection

Datasets

Coding of US Presidential discourse on protection

Cite this