Working identities? Antagonistic discursive resources and managerial identity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the principal antagonistic discourses on which managers in a large UK-based engineering company drew in their efforts to construct versions of their selves. Predicated on an understanding that subjectively construed discursive identities are available to individuals as in-progress narratives that are contingent and fragile, the research contribution we make is threefold. First, we argue that managers may draw on mutually antagonistic discursive resources in authoring conceptions of their selves. Second, we contend that rather than being relatively coherent or completely fluid and fragmented managers' identity narratives may incorporate contrasting positions or antagonisms. Third, we show that managers' identity work constituted a continuing quest to ( re)-author their selves as moral beings. Antagonisms in managers' identities, we suggest, may appropriately be analysed as the complex and ambiguous effects of organizationally based disciplinary practices and individuals' discursive responses to them.
LanguageEnglish
Pages323-352
Number of pages30
JournalHuman Relations
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Managers
manager
resources
antagonism
narrative
Discursive
Resources
engineering
Fluids
discourse
Industry
Antagonism

Keywords

  • identity
  • moral
  • managers
  • discipline
  • discourse
  • emotion

Cite this

Working identities? Antagonistic discursive resources and managerial identity. / Clarke, Caroline A.; Brown, Andrew D.; Hope Hailey, Veronica.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 323-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcee8879530544f29b463000dc008cf3,
title = "Working identities? Antagonistic discursive resources and managerial identity",
abstract = "In this article, we analyse the principal antagonistic discourses on which managers in a large UK-based engineering company drew in their efforts to construct versions of their selves. Predicated on an understanding that subjectively construed discursive identities are available to individuals as in-progress narratives that are contingent and fragile, the research contribution we make is threefold. First, we argue that managers may draw on mutually antagonistic discursive resources in authoring conceptions of their selves. Second, we contend that rather than being relatively coherent or completely fluid and fragmented managers' identity narratives may incorporate contrasting positions or antagonisms. Third, we show that managers' identity work constituted a continuing quest to ( re)-author their selves as moral beings. Antagonisms in managers' identities, we suggest, may appropriately be analysed as the complex and ambiguous effects of organizationally based disciplinary practices and individuals' discursive responses to them.",
keywords = "identity, moral, managers, discipline, discourse, emotion",
author = "Clarke, {Caroline A.} and Brown, {Andrew D.} and {Hope Hailey}, Veronica",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0018726708101040",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "323--352",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working identities? Antagonistic discursive resources and managerial identity

AU - Clarke, Caroline A.

AU - Brown, Andrew D.

AU - Hope Hailey, Veronica

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - In this article, we analyse the principal antagonistic discourses on which managers in a large UK-based engineering company drew in their efforts to construct versions of their selves. Predicated on an understanding that subjectively construed discursive identities are available to individuals as in-progress narratives that are contingent and fragile, the research contribution we make is threefold. First, we argue that managers may draw on mutually antagonistic discursive resources in authoring conceptions of their selves. Second, we contend that rather than being relatively coherent or completely fluid and fragmented managers' identity narratives may incorporate contrasting positions or antagonisms. Third, we show that managers' identity work constituted a continuing quest to ( re)-author their selves as moral beings. Antagonisms in managers' identities, we suggest, may appropriately be analysed as the complex and ambiguous effects of organizationally based disciplinary practices and individuals' discursive responses to them.

AB - In this article, we analyse the principal antagonistic discourses on which managers in a large UK-based engineering company drew in their efforts to construct versions of their selves. Predicated on an understanding that subjectively construed discursive identities are available to individuals as in-progress narratives that are contingent and fragile, the research contribution we make is threefold. First, we argue that managers may draw on mutually antagonistic discursive resources in authoring conceptions of their selves. Second, we contend that rather than being relatively coherent or completely fluid and fragmented managers' identity narratives may incorporate contrasting positions or antagonisms. Third, we show that managers' identity work constituted a continuing quest to ( re)-author their selves as moral beings. Antagonisms in managers' identities, we suggest, may appropriately be analysed as the complex and ambiguous effects of organizationally based disciplinary practices and individuals' discursive responses to them.

KW - identity

KW - moral

KW - managers

KW - discipline

KW - discourse

KW - emotion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61449224542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101040

U2 - 10.1177/0018726708101040

DO - 10.1177/0018726708101040

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 323

EP - 352

JO - Human Relations

T2 - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 3

ER -