Women acting for women? An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (SciVal)
597 Downloads (Pure)


The recent push for more women parliamentarians around the world via positive action measures such as gender quotas naturally begs the question of whether the increased descriptive representation of women in parliament is making a substantive difference, in terms of the types of policies passed, behavioral norms, and procedures. How does the substantive representation of women take place? One way of measuring gendered impacts in politics is to look at the participation of Members of Parliament (MPs) in formal, parliamentary debate on key policy issues. It is reasonable to assume that one (though certainly not the only) measure of a good MP is his or her ability to contribute his or her voice and thoughts to public policy debates in parliament. Furthermore, if we consider women MPs representative of women in particular as a marginalized group, making their voices heard in parliamentary debates is perhaps one of the best ways of acting for women. As Melissa Williams (1998, 138) argues, the unique voice of women is a necessary component for women's political equality:
It is not enough that women communicate their perspectives to men; a full respect for women's agency, and a full protection of their interests, requires that they act on their own behalf. Only through their legislative presence can women be sure that the “woman's point of view” on each policy issue is formulated and expressed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-68
Number of pages14
JournalPolitics & Gender
Issue number01
Early online date1 Mar 2009
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Women acting for women? An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this