Why Women are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators

Renata Bongiorno, Chloe Langbroek, Paul Bain, Michelle Ting, Michelle Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The #MeToo movement has highlighted the widespread problem of men’s sexual harassment of women. Women are typically reluctant to make a sexual-harassment complaint and often encounter victim-blaming attitudes when they do, especially from men. Informed by the social identity perspective, two experiments examined the influence of empathy—both for women who are sexually harassed and for male harassers—on men’s and women’s propensity to blame victims. In Study 1, university students (N = 97) responded to a vignette describing a male student’s harassment of a female student. Men blamed the victim more than women, which was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator but not lesser empathy for the female victim. Using the same vignette, Study 2 asked university students (N = 135) to take either the male perpetrator’s or the female victim’s perspective. Regardless of participant gender, participants who took the male-perpetrator’s perspective versus the female-victim’s perspective reported greater victim blame, and this was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator and lesser empathy for the female victim. Together, the findings provide evidence to suggest that male-perpetrator empathy may be equally or more important than female-victim empathy for explaining victim blame for sexual harassment. Implications for social-change, including policies to limit the effects of male-perpetrator empathy when responding to sexual-harassment complaints are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
Early online date18 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Aug 2019

Keywords

  • empathy
  • sexual harassment
  • victim blame

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Why Women are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators. / Bongiorno, Renata; Langbroek, Chloe; Bain, Paul; Ting, Michelle; Ryan, Michelle.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18.08.2019, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21a71649a97b455baa137e814be7ed2e,
title = "Why Women are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators",
abstract = "The #MeToo movement has highlighted the widespread problem of men’s sexual harassment of women. Women are typically reluctant to make a sexual-harassment complaint and often encounter victim-blaming attitudes when they do, especially from men. Informed by the social identity perspective, two experiments examined the influence of empathy—both for women who are sexually harassed and for male harassers—on men’s and women’s propensity to blame victims. In Study 1, university students (N = 97) responded to a vignette describing a male student’s harassment of a female student. Men blamed the victim more than women, which was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator but not lesser empathy for the female victim. Using the same vignette, Study 2 asked university students (N = 135) to take either the male perpetrator’s or the female victim’s perspective. Regardless of participant gender, participants who took the male-perpetrator’s perspective versus the female-victim’s perspective reported greater victim blame, and this was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator and lesser empathy for the female victim. Together, the findings provide evidence to suggest that male-perpetrator empathy may be equally or more important than female-victim empathy for explaining victim blame for sexual harassment. Implications for social-change, including policies to limit the effects of male-perpetrator empathy when responding to sexual-harassment complaints are discussed.",
keywords = "empathy, sexual harassment, victim blame",
author = "Renata Bongiorno and Chloe Langbroek and Paul Bain and Michelle Ting and Michelle Ryan",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1177/0361684319868730",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Women are Blamed for Being Sexually Harassed: The Effects of Empathy for Female Victims and Male Perpetrators

AU - Bongiorno, Renata

AU - Langbroek, Chloe

AU - Bain, Paul

AU - Ting, Michelle

AU - Ryan, Michelle

PY - 2019/8/18

Y1 - 2019/8/18

N2 - The #MeToo movement has highlighted the widespread problem of men’s sexual harassment of women. Women are typically reluctant to make a sexual-harassment complaint and often encounter victim-blaming attitudes when they do, especially from men. Informed by the social identity perspective, two experiments examined the influence of empathy—both for women who are sexually harassed and for male harassers—on men’s and women’s propensity to blame victims. In Study 1, university students (N = 97) responded to a vignette describing a male student’s harassment of a female student. Men blamed the victim more than women, which was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator but not lesser empathy for the female victim. Using the same vignette, Study 2 asked university students (N = 135) to take either the male perpetrator’s or the female victim’s perspective. Regardless of participant gender, participants who took the male-perpetrator’s perspective versus the female-victim’s perspective reported greater victim blame, and this was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator and lesser empathy for the female victim. Together, the findings provide evidence to suggest that male-perpetrator empathy may be equally or more important than female-victim empathy for explaining victim blame for sexual harassment. Implications for social-change, including policies to limit the effects of male-perpetrator empathy when responding to sexual-harassment complaints are discussed.

AB - The #MeToo movement has highlighted the widespread problem of men’s sexual harassment of women. Women are typically reluctant to make a sexual-harassment complaint and often encounter victim-blaming attitudes when they do, especially from men. Informed by the social identity perspective, two experiments examined the influence of empathy—both for women who are sexually harassed and for male harassers—on men’s and women’s propensity to blame victims. In Study 1, university students (N = 97) responded to a vignette describing a male student’s harassment of a female student. Men blamed the victim more than women, which was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator but not lesser empathy for the female victim. Using the same vignette, Study 2 asked university students (N = 135) to take either the male perpetrator’s or the female victim’s perspective. Regardless of participant gender, participants who took the male-perpetrator’s perspective versus the female-victim’s perspective reported greater victim blame, and this was explained by their greater empathy for the male perpetrator and lesser empathy for the female victim. Together, the findings provide evidence to suggest that male-perpetrator empathy may be equally or more important than female-victim empathy for explaining victim blame for sexual harassment. Implications for social-change, including policies to limit the effects of male-perpetrator empathy when responding to sexual-harassment complaints are discussed.

KW - empathy

KW - sexual harassment

KW - victim blame

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071515914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361684319868730

DO - 10.1177/0361684319868730

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

ER -