Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive: A response to Philibert and Sayers

Helen Haste

doi:10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3

Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive: A response to Philibert and Sayers

Helen Haste

School of Social Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

These two papers make valuable contributions to a growing debate which seems likely to dominate thinking about gender development for the next decade. They are significant even though Sayer's paper is based on a misunderstanding of Gilligan's model and Philibert does not place enough importance on early adolescence and childhood in his critique.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	215-221
Number of pages	7
Journal	New Ideas in Psychology
Volume	5
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3
Publication status	Published - 31 Dec 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Psychology (miscellaneous)
General Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3

Cite this

@article{27771dff2aa54f14a6388463275f58b9,

title = "Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive: A response to Philibert and Sayers",

abstract = "These two papers make valuable contributions to a growing debate which seems likely to dominate thinking about gender development for the next decade. They are significant even though Sayer's paper is based on a misunderstanding of Gilligan's model and Philibert does not place enough importance on early adolescence and childhood in his critique.",

author = "Helen Haste",

year = "1987",

month = dec,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "215--221",

journal = "New Ideas in Psychology",

issn = "0732-118X",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive

T2 - A response to Philibert and Sayers

AU - Haste, Helen

PY - 1987/12/31

Y1 - 1987/12/31

N2 - These two papers make valuable contributions to a growing debate which seems likely to dominate thinking about gender development for the next decade. They are significant even though Sayer's paper is based on a misunderstanding of Gilligan's model and Philibert does not place enough importance on early adolescence and childhood in his critique.

AB - These two papers make valuable contributions to a growing debate which seems likely to dominate thinking about gender development for the next decade. They are significant even though Sayer's paper is based on a misunderstanding of Gilligan's model and Philibert does not place enough importance on early adolescence and childhood in his critique.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/45949130618

U2 - 10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3

DO - 10.1016/0732-118X(87)90018-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:45949130618

SN - 0732-118X

VL - 5

SP - 215

EP - 221

JO - New Ideas in Psychology

JF - New Ideas in Psychology

IS - 2

ER -

Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive: A response to Philibert and Sayers

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this