Why thinking about feeling isn't the same as feeling about feeling, and why post-androgyny is dialectical not regressive: A response to Philibert and Sayers

These two papers make valuable contributions to a growing debate which seems likely to dominate thinking about gender development for the next decade. They are significant even though Sayer's paper is based on a misunderstanding of Gilligan's model and Philibert does not place enough importance on early adolescence and childhood in his critique.