Why the Welsh said yes, but the Northerners no

the role of political parties in consolidating territorial government

David S. Moon, Øivind Bratberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article focuses on the role played by the Labour Party in two devolution referendums, in Wales in 1997 and in the North-East region in 2004. Comparing the positive vote of the Welsh and the negative vote of the North shows how the governing party – the Labour Party which has also been historically dominant in each of these regions – contributed to the contrasting outcome. Our argument is that dominant parties impact both in their formal (structural, institutional) and non-formal (cultural, identity) aspects. The crucial role of the leading party is thus to enable (or constrain) a sub-state space for politics and popular mobilisation on territorial grounds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-340
JournalContemporary British History
Volume28
Issue number3
Early online date25 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Labour Party
voter
labor
Personnel
referendum
cultural identity
devolution
decentralization
mobilization
politics
political party
territorial government
Political Parties
Government
Wales
Devolution
Referendum
Northeast
Mobilization
Cultural Identity

Keywords

  • devolution
  • referendums
  • Labour Party
  • Electoral Campaigns
  • Regional Identity

Cite this

Why the Welsh said yes, but the Northerners no : the role of political parties in consolidating territorial government. / Moon, David S.; Bratberg, Øivind.

In: Contemporary British History, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2014, p. 318-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77c979e6580c4e73a00b49b72b5fd6fc,
title = "Why the Welsh said yes, but the Northerners no: the role of political parties in consolidating territorial government",
abstract = "This article focuses on the role played by the Labour Party in two devolution referendums, in Wales in 1997 and in the North-East region in 2004. Comparing the positive vote of the Welsh and the negative vote of the North shows how the governing party – the Labour Party which has also been historically dominant in each of these regions – contributed to the contrasting outcome. Our argument is that dominant parties impact both in their formal (structural, institutional) and non-formal (cultural, identity) aspects. The crucial role of the leading party is thus to enable (or constrain) a sub-state space for politics and popular mobilisation on territorial grounds.",
keywords = "devolution, referendums, Labour Party, Electoral Campaigns, Regional Identity",
author = "Moon, {David S.} and {\O}ivind Bratberg",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/13619462.2014.941818",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "318--340",
journal = "Contemporary British History",
issn = "1361-9462",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the Welsh said yes, but the Northerners no

T2 - the role of political parties in consolidating territorial government

AU - Moon, David S.

AU - Bratberg, Øivind

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article focuses on the role played by the Labour Party in two devolution referendums, in Wales in 1997 and in the North-East region in 2004. Comparing the positive vote of the Welsh and the negative vote of the North shows how the governing party – the Labour Party which has also been historically dominant in each of these regions – contributed to the contrasting outcome. Our argument is that dominant parties impact both in their formal (structural, institutional) and non-formal (cultural, identity) aspects. The crucial role of the leading party is thus to enable (or constrain) a sub-state space for politics and popular mobilisation on territorial grounds.

AB - This article focuses on the role played by the Labour Party in two devolution referendums, in Wales in 1997 and in the North-East region in 2004. Comparing the positive vote of the Welsh and the negative vote of the North shows how the governing party – the Labour Party which has also been historically dominant in each of these regions – contributed to the contrasting outcome. Our argument is that dominant parties impact both in their formal (structural, institutional) and non-formal (cultural, identity) aspects. The crucial role of the leading party is thus to enable (or constrain) a sub-state space for politics and popular mobilisation on territorial grounds.

KW - devolution

KW - referendums

KW - Labour Party

KW - Electoral Campaigns

KW - Regional Identity

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2014.941818

U2 - 10.1080/13619462.2014.941818

DO - 10.1080/13619462.2014.941818

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 318

EP - 340

JO - Contemporary British History

JF - Contemporary British History

SN - 1361-9462

IS - 3

ER -