Why soft climate deals are better than tough ones

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

The Paris climate talks have been heralded as a historic deal. But while they have been praised for the very feat of reaching an agreement and for setting an ambitious aim to keep warming below 2℃ and endeavouring to limit it to 1.5℃, the agreement has been criticised for being weak. In terms of achieving the 1.5℃ limit, it is up to the states themselves to change their behaviour and they can pull out of the agreement at any point. This, however, might not be such a bad thing.
LanguageEnglish
Specialist publicationThe Conversation
StatusPublished - 14 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

climate
heating

Cite this

Why soft climate deals are better than tough ones. / Fairchild, Richard; Yalabik, Baris.

In: The Conversation, 14.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

@misc{cdffba5a6c4649cf8443e263760625bc,
title = "Why soft climate deals are better than tough ones",
abstract = "The Paris climate talks have been heralded as a historic deal. But while they have been praised for the very feat of reaching an agreement and for setting an ambitious aim to keep warming below 2℃ and endeavouring to limit it to 1.5℃, the agreement has been criticised for being weak. In terms of achieving the 1.5℃ limit, it is up to the states themselves to change their behaviour and they can pull out of the agreement at any point. This, however, might not be such a bad thing.",
author = "Richard Fairchild and Baris Yalabik",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "14",
language = "English",
journal = "The Conversation",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Why soft climate deals are better than tough ones

AU - Fairchild, Richard

AU - Yalabik, Baris

PY - 2015/12/14

Y1 - 2015/12/14

N2 - The Paris climate talks have been heralded as a historic deal. But while they have been praised for the very feat of reaching an agreement and for setting an ambitious aim to keep warming below 2℃ and endeavouring to limit it to 1.5℃, the agreement has been criticised for being weak. In terms of achieving the 1.5℃ limit, it is up to the states themselves to change their behaviour and they can pull out of the agreement at any point. This, however, might not be such a bad thing.

AB - The Paris climate talks have been heralded as a historic deal. But while they have been praised for the very feat of reaching an agreement and for setting an ambitious aim to keep warming below 2℃ and endeavouring to limit it to 1.5℃, the agreement has been criticised for being weak. In terms of achieving the 1.5℃ limit, it is up to the states themselves to change their behaviour and they can pull out of the agreement at any point. This, however, might not be such a bad thing.

UR - https://theconversation.com/why-soft-climate-deals-are-better-than-tough-ones-51720?ct=t(Headlines_101215)&mc_cid=93f2fc00ec&mc_eid=88eb42e8c7

UR - https://theconversation.com/why-soft-climate-deals-are-better-than-tough-ones-51720?ct=t(Headlines_101215)&mc_cid=93f2fc00ec&mc_eid=88eb42e8c7

M3 - Article

JO - The Conversation

T2 - The Conversation

JF - The Conversation

ER -