Abstract
We investigated the appraisal processes and personality antecedents that regulate people's attraction to schema-violations - targets and objects that disconfirm schema- and stereotype-based expectancies. In two studies a preference for schema-violations (vs. consistencies) correlated positively with openness to experience, and negatively with the need for structure. In the second study, schema-violations were seen as more surprising (by all individuals), decreasing intentions to approach schema-violations, but were also seen as more interesting (by those higher in openness to experience), increasing intentions to approach and accept schema-violations. This suggests that two opposing processes - appraisals of surprise and appraisals of interest - regulate reactions to schema-violations, and that these processes are bounded by individual differences in openness to experience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54-69 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
| Volume | 66 |
| Early online date | 26 Dec 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Feb 2017 |
Keywords
- Consistency
- Inconsistency
- Interest
- Need for closure
- Need for structure
- Openness to experience
- Schema-violations
- Surprise
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- General Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why schema-violations are sometimes preferable to schema-consistencies: The role of interest and openness to experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Gosia Goclowska
- Department of Psychology - Senior Lecturer
- Bath Institute for the Augmented Human
Person: Research & Teaching, Affiliate staff