Why care?

Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour

T. Székely, V. Remeš, R.P. Freckleton, A. Liker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phylogenetic comparative analyses of complex traits often reduce the traits of interests into a single (or a few) component variables. Here, we show that this may be an over-simplification, because components of a complex trait may evolve independently from each other. Using eight components of parental care in 400 bird species from 89 avian families that represent the relative contribution of male vs. female to a particular type of care, we show that some components evolve in a highly correlated manner, whereas others exhibit low (or no) phylogenetic correlation. Correlations were stronger within types of parental activity (brooding, feeding, guarding) than within stages of the breeding cycle (incubation, prefledging care, post-fledging care). A phylogenetically corrected cluster analysis identified two groups of parental care components that evolved in a correlated fashion: one group included incubation and brooding, whereas the other group comprised of the remaining components. The two groups of components provide working hypotheses for follow-up studies to test the underlying genetic, developmental and ecological co-evolutionary mechanism between male and female care. Furthermore, the components within each group are expected to respond consistently to different ambient and social environments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1381-1391
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume26
Issue number7
Early online date13 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

parental care
social behavior
incubation
phylogenetics
social environment
fledging
phylogeny
reproductive cycle
cluster analysis
birds
breeding
testing
brooding
test
family
bird species
fledglings

Cite this

Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour. / Székely, T.; Remeš, V.; Freckleton, R.P.; Liker, A.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 1381-1391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Székely, T. ; Remeš, V. ; Freckleton, R.P. ; Liker, A. / Why care? Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour. In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 7. pp. 1381-1391.
@article{d144a836d15144a8862dcda4ab5e4231,
title = "Why care?: Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour",
abstract = "Phylogenetic comparative analyses of complex traits often reduce the traits of interests into a single (or a few) component variables. Here, we show that this may be an over-simplification, because components of a complex trait may evolve independently from each other. Using eight components of parental care in 400 bird species from 89 avian families that represent the relative contribution of male vs. female to a particular type of care, we show that some components evolve in a highly correlated manner, whereas others exhibit low (or no) phylogenetic correlation. Correlations were stronger within types of parental activity (brooding, feeding, guarding) than within stages of the breeding cycle (incubation, prefledging care, post-fledging care). A phylogenetically corrected cluster analysis identified two groups of parental care components that evolved in a correlated fashion: one group included incubation and brooding, whereas the other group comprised of the remaining components. The two groups of components provide working hypotheses for follow-up studies to test the underlying genetic, developmental and ecological co-evolutionary mechanism between male and female care. Furthermore, the components within each group are expected to respond consistently to different ambient and social environments.",
author = "T. Sz{\'e}kely and V. Remeš and R.P. Freckleton and A. Liker",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/jeb.12148",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1381--1391",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why care?

T2 - Inferring the evolution of complex social behaviour

AU - Székely, T.

AU - Remeš, V.

AU - Freckleton, R.P.

AU - Liker, A.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Phylogenetic comparative analyses of complex traits often reduce the traits of interests into a single (or a few) component variables. Here, we show that this may be an over-simplification, because components of a complex trait may evolve independently from each other. Using eight components of parental care in 400 bird species from 89 avian families that represent the relative contribution of male vs. female to a particular type of care, we show that some components evolve in a highly correlated manner, whereas others exhibit low (or no) phylogenetic correlation. Correlations were stronger within types of parental activity (brooding, feeding, guarding) than within stages of the breeding cycle (incubation, prefledging care, post-fledging care). A phylogenetically corrected cluster analysis identified two groups of parental care components that evolved in a correlated fashion: one group included incubation and brooding, whereas the other group comprised of the remaining components. The two groups of components provide working hypotheses for follow-up studies to test the underlying genetic, developmental and ecological co-evolutionary mechanism between male and female care. Furthermore, the components within each group are expected to respond consistently to different ambient and social environments.

AB - Phylogenetic comparative analyses of complex traits often reduce the traits of interests into a single (or a few) component variables. Here, we show that this may be an over-simplification, because components of a complex trait may evolve independently from each other. Using eight components of parental care in 400 bird species from 89 avian families that represent the relative contribution of male vs. female to a particular type of care, we show that some components evolve in a highly correlated manner, whereas others exhibit low (or no) phylogenetic correlation. Correlations were stronger within types of parental activity (brooding, feeding, guarding) than within stages of the breeding cycle (incubation, prefledging care, post-fledging care). A phylogenetically corrected cluster analysis identified two groups of parental care components that evolved in a correlated fashion: one group included incubation and brooding, whereas the other group comprised of the remaining components. The two groups of components provide working hypotheses for follow-up studies to test the underlying genetic, developmental and ecological co-evolutionary mechanism between male and female care. Furthermore, the components within each group are expected to respond consistently to different ambient and social environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876276868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-84876276868&md5=b52b6afbc478678a1aae47cbd1e05bf6

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12148

U2 - 10.1111/jeb.12148

DO - 10.1111/jeb.12148

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1381

EP - 1391

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 7

ER -