TY - JOUR
T1 - WHOQOL-HIV for quality of life assessment among people living with HIV and AIDS: results from the field test
AU - O'Connell, K A
AU - Saxena, S
AU - Skevington, S M
AU - Grp, Whoqol Hiv
N1 - ID number: ISI:000224195200010
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Assessment of quality of life (QoL) in persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is becoming crucial to research and evidence-based practice in this area. This paper describes the analysis of the WHOQOL HIV field test instrument, which was given to 1,334 PLWHA from seven culturally diverse centres ( Australia, Brazil, Italy, Thailand, Ukraine and two centres in India: Bangalore and New Delhi). The instrument demonstrates good psychometric properties ( a values for domains between 0.70 and 0.90) and good discriminant validity, with poorest QoL found for those who reported that they were least well. Men reported poorer physical well-being ( F = 13.1, p < 0.001) and level of independence (F = 16.1, p < 0.001), while women reported poorer environment (F = 25.8, p < 0.001), social support (F = 11.3, p < 0.001) and spirituality (F = 7.5, p < 0.01). Older people (>34 years) demonstrated poorer QoL on physical (F = 20.6, p < 0.001) and levels of independence (F = 18.3, p < 0.001), while younger people showed poorer environmental (F = 34.6, p < 0.001) and spiritual (F = 23.5, p < 0.001) domains of well-being. The instrument provides a promising means for QoL assessment for HIV/AIDS in diverse cultural settings.
AB - Assessment of quality of life (QoL) in persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is becoming crucial to research and evidence-based practice in this area. This paper describes the analysis of the WHOQOL HIV field test instrument, which was given to 1,334 PLWHA from seven culturally diverse centres ( Australia, Brazil, Italy, Thailand, Ukraine and two centres in India: Bangalore and New Delhi). The instrument demonstrates good psychometric properties ( a values for domains between 0.70 and 0.90) and good discriminant validity, with poorest QoL found for those who reported that they were least well. Men reported poorer physical well-being ( F = 13.1, p < 0.001) and level of independence (F = 16.1, p < 0.001), while women reported poorer environment (F = 25.8, p < 0.001), social support (F = 11.3, p < 0.001) and spirituality (F = 7.5, p < 0.01). Older people (>34 years) demonstrated poorer QoL on physical (F = 20.6, p < 0.001) and levels of independence (F = 18.3, p < 0.001), while younger people showed poorer environmental (F = 34.6, p < 0.001) and spiritual (F = 23.5, p < 0.001) domains of well-being. The instrument provides a promising means for QoL assessment for HIV/AIDS in diverse cultural settings.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540120412331290194
U2 - 10.1080/09540120412331290194
DO - 10.1080/09540120412331290194
M3 - Article
SN - 0954-0121
VL - 16
SP - 882
EP - 889
JO - Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/Hiv
JF - Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/Hiv
IS - 7
ER -
