Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling

Peter L Jacobsen, Francesca Racioppi, Harry Rutter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 78 Citations

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of traffic on levels of walking and bicycling.
Method: Review of the literature of medical, public health, city planning, public administration and traffic engineering.
Results: The real and perceived danger and discomfort imposed by traffic discourage walking and bicycling. Accurately or not, pedestrians and bicyclists judge injury risk and respond accordingly. Although it can be difficult to measure these effects, observed behaviour provides good evidence for these effects, with the strongest association being an inverse correlation between volumes and speeds of traffic and levels of walking and cycling.
Conclusion: Interventions to reduce traffic speed and volume are likely to promote walking and bicycling and thus result in public health gains.
LanguageEnglish
Pages369-373
Number of pages5
JournalInjury Prevention
Volume15
Issue number6
Early online date3 Dec 2009
DOIs
StatusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Bicycling
Walking
Public Health
City Planning
Health Planning
Wounds and Injuries

Cite this

Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. / Jacobsen, Peter L; Racioppi, Francesca; Rutter, Harry.

In: Injury Prevention, Vol. 15, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 369-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobsen, Peter L ; Racioppi, Francesca ; Rutter, Harry. / Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. In: Injury Prevention. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 369-373.
@article{e6bab23ad5434e7fa0f448a07027defd,
title = "Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the impact of traffic on levels of walking and bicycling.Method: Review of the literature of medical, public health, city planning, public administration and traffic engineering.Results: The real and perceived danger and discomfort imposed by traffic discourage walking and bicycling. Accurately or not, pedestrians and bicyclists judge injury risk and respond accordingly. Although it can be difficult to measure these effects, observed behaviour provides good evidence for these effects, with the strongest association being an inverse correlation between volumes and speeds of traffic and levels of walking and cycling.Conclusion: Interventions to reduce traffic speed and volume are likely to promote walking and bicycling and thus result in public health gains.",
author = "Jacobsen, {Peter L} and Francesca Racioppi and Harry Rutter",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1136/ip.2009.022566",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "369--373",
journal = "Injury Prevention",
issn = "1353-8047",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling

AU - Jacobsen, Peter L

AU - Racioppi, Francesca

AU - Rutter, Harry

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Objective: To examine the impact of traffic on levels of walking and bicycling.Method: Review of the literature of medical, public health, city planning, public administration and traffic engineering.Results: The real and perceived danger and discomfort imposed by traffic discourage walking and bicycling. Accurately or not, pedestrians and bicyclists judge injury risk and respond accordingly. Although it can be difficult to measure these effects, observed behaviour provides good evidence for these effects, with the strongest association being an inverse correlation between volumes and speeds of traffic and levels of walking and cycling.Conclusion: Interventions to reduce traffic speed and volume are likely to promote walking and bicycling and thus result in public health gains.

AB - Objective: To examine the impact of traffic on levels of walking and bicycling.Method: Review of the literature of medical, public health, city planning, public administration and traffic engineering.Results: The real and perceived danger and discomfort imposed by traffic discourage walking and bicycling. Accurately or not, pedestrians and bicyclists judge injury risk and respond accordingly. Although it can be difficult to measure these effects, observed behaviour provides good evidence for these effects, with the strongest association being an inverse correlation between volumes and speeds of traffic and levels of walking and cycling.Conclusion: Interventions to reduce traffic speed and volume are likely to promote walking and bicycling and thus result in public health gains.

U2 - 10.1136/ip.2009.022566

DO - 10.1136/ip.2009.022566

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 369

EP - 373

JO - Injury Prevention

T2 - Injury Prevention

JF - Injury Prevention

SN - 1353-8047

IS - 6

ER -