Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions?

David I. Stern, John C. V. Pezzey, N. Ross Lambie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Countries with low marginal costs of abating carbon emissions may have high total costs, and vice versa, for a given climate mitigation policy. This may help to explain different countries’ policy stances on climate mitigation. We hypothesize that, under a common percentage cut in emissions intensity relative to business as usual (BAU), countries with higher BAU emission intensities have lower marginal abatement costs, but total costs relative to output will be similar across countries, and under a common carbon price, relative total costs are higher in emission-intensive countries. Using the results of the 22nd Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-22), we estimate marginal abatement cost curves for the US, EU, China and India, which we use to estimate marginal and total costs of abatement under a number of policy options currently under international debate. This analysis provides support for our hypotheses, although its reliability is limited by the shortcomings of the EMF-22 models and the degree to which our econometric model can adequately account for the substantial differences among them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-331
JournalAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

emissions factor
Carbon
Costs and Cost Analysis
carbon markets
environmental policy
econometric models
carbon
pollution control
climate
India
China
Climate
energy
Econometric Models
Carbon emissions
Costs
marginal abatement cost curve
Electromagnetic fields
Marginal abatement costs
Mitigation

Cite this

Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions? / Stern, David I.; Pezzey, John C. V.; Lambie, N. Ross.

In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 56, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 315-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stern, David I. ; Pezzey, John C. V. ; Lambie, N. Ross. / Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions?. In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2012 ; Vol. 56, No. 3. pp. 315-331.
@article{02c09dece9d7403cbae59a31afd9c517,
title = "Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions?",
abstract = "Countries with low marginal costs of abating carbon emissions may have high total costs, and vice versa, for a given climate mitigation policy. This may help to explain different countries’ policy stances on climate mitigation. We hypothesize that, under a common percentage cut in emissions intensity relative to business as usual (BAU), countries with higher BAU emission intensities have lower marginal abatement costs, but total costs relative to output will be similar across countries, and under a common carbon price, relative total costs are higher in emission-intensive countries. Using the results of the 22nd Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-22), we estimate marginal abatement cost curves for the US, EU, China and India, which we use to estimate marginal and total costs of abatement under a number of policy options currently under international debate. This analysis provides support for our hypotheses, although its reliability is limited by the shortcomings of the EMF-22 models and the degree to which our econometric model can adequately account for the substantial differences among them.",
author = "Stern, {David I.} and Pezzey, {John C. V.} and Lambie, {N. Ross}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00576.x",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "315--331",
journal = "Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics",
issn = "1364-985X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions?

AU - Stern, David I.

AU - Pezzey, John C. V.

AU - Lambie, N. Ross

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Countries with low marginal costs of abating carbon emissions may have high total costs, and vice versa, for a given climate mitigation policy. This may help to explain different countries’ policy stances on climate mitigation. We hypothesize that, under a common percentage cut in emissions intensity relative to business as usual (BAU), countries with higher BAU emission intensities have lower marginal abatement costs, but total costs relative to output will be similar across countries, and under a common carbon price, relative total costs are higher in emission-intensive countries. Using the results of the 22nd Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-22), we estimate marginal abatement cost curves for the US, EU, China and India, which we use to estimate marginal and total costs of abatement under a number of policy options currently under international debate. This analysis provides support for our hypotheses, although its reliability is limited by the shortcomings of the EMF-22 models and the degree to which our econometric model can adequately account for the substantial differences among them.

AB - Countries with low marginal costs of abating carbon emissions may have high total costs, and vice versa, for a given climate mitigation policy. This may help to explain different countries’ policy stances on climate mitigation. We hypothesize that, under a common percentage cut in emissions intensity relative to business as usual (BAU), countries with higher BAU emission intensities have lower marginal abatement costs, but total costs relative to output will be similar across countries, and under a common carbon price, relative total costs are higher in emission-intensive countries. Using the results of the 22nd Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-22), we estimate marginal abatement cost curves for the US, EU, China and India, which we use to estimate marginal and total costs of abatement under a number of policy options currently under international debate. This analysis provides support for our hypotheses, although its reliability is limited by the shortcomings of the EMF-22 models and the degree to which our econometric model can adequately account for the substantial differences among them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862734864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00576.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00576.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00576.x

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 315

EP - 331

JO - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

JF - Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

SN - 1364-985X

IS - 3

ER -