When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference

G Crombez, Christopher Eccleston, F Baeyens, P Eelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

262 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Styles of catastrophic thinking about pain have been related to an inability to divert attention away from pain. We investigated whether pain catastrophizers displayed high attentional interference during a threatening low-intensity electrocutaneous stimulus (ES). In Experiment 1, 44 undergraduates performed a tone discrimination task whilst experiencing several times an ES on the left or right arms. Tones were also presented 250 ms and 750 ms after ES onset. Participants were threatened that a high-intensity painful stimulus would occur at one site. As predicted, pain catastrophizers displayed pronounced task interference immediately after threat stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, threat was induced in 36 undergraduates by informing them that an ES excites pain fibres. Again, catastrophizers had marked interference immediately after onset. The results are discussed in terms of how catastrophizing amplifies somatosensory information and primes fear mechanisms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-198
Number of pages12
JournalPain
Volume75
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1998

Fingerprint

Pain
Catastrophization
Fear
Thinking

Cite this

When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference. / Crombez, G; Eccleston, Christopher; Baeyens, F; Eelen, P.

In: Pain, Vol. 75, No. 2-3, 01.1998, p. 187-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crombez, G ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Baeyens, F ; Eelen, P. / When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference. In: Pain. 1998 ; Vol. 75, No. 2-3. pp. 187-198.
@article{ae0b5afce8ef4451b7be076204591322,
title = "When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference",
abstract = "Styles of catastrophic thinking about pain have been related to an inability to divert attention away from pain. We investigated whether pain catastrophizers displayed high attentional interference during a threatening low-intensity electrocutaneous stimulus (ES). In Experiment 1, 44 undergraduates performed a tone discrimination task whilst experiencing several times an ES on the left or right arms. Tones were also presented 250 ms and 750 ms after ES onset. Participants were threatened that a high-intensity painful stimulus would occur at one site. As predicted, pain catastrophizers displayed pronounced task interference immediately after threat stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, threat was induced in 36 undergraduates by informing them that an ES excites pain fibres. Again, catastrophizers had marked interference immediately after onset. The results are discussed in terms of how catastrophizing amplifies somatosensory information and primes fear mechanisms.",
author = "G Crombez and Christopher Eccleston and F Baeyens and P Eelen",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00219-4",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "187--198",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When somatic information threatens, catastrophic thinking enhances attentional interference

AU - Crombez, G

AU - Eccleston, Christopher

AU - Baeyens, F

AU - Eelen, P

PY - 1998/1

Y1 - 1998/1

N2 - Styles of catastrophic thinking about pain have been related to an inability to divert attention away from pain. We investigated whether pain catastrophizers displayed high attentional interference during a threatening low-intensity electrocutaneous stimulus (ES). In Experiment 1, 44 undergraduates performed a tone discrimination task whilst experiencing several times an ES on the left or right arms. Tones were also presented 250 ms and 750 ms after ES onset. Participants were threatened that a high-intensity painful stimulus would occur at one site. As predicted, pain catastrophizers displayed pronounced task interference immediately after threat stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, threat was induced in 36 undergraduates by informing them that an ES excites pain fibres. Again, catastrophizers had marked interference immediately after onset. The results are discussed in terms of how catastrophizing amplifies somatosensory information and primes fear mechanisms.

AB - Styles of catastrophic thinking about pain have been related to an inability to divert attention away from pain. We investigated whether pain catastrophizers displayed high attentional interference during a threatening low-intensity electrocutaneous stimulus (ES). In Experiment 1, 44 undergraduates performed a tone discrimination task whilst experiencing several times an ES on the left or right arms. Tones were also presented 250 ms and 750 ms after ES onset. Participants were threatened that a high-intensity painful stimulus would occur at one site. As predicted, pain catastrophizers displayed pronounced task interference immediately after threat stimulus onset. In Experiment 2, threat was induced in 36 undergraduates by informing them that an ES excites pain fibres. Again, catastrophizers had marked interference immediately after onset. The results are discussed in terms of how catastrophizing amplifies somatosensory information and primes fear mechanisms.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00219-4

U2 - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00219-4

DO - 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00219-4

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 187

EP - 198

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 2-3

ER -