When precaution creates misunderstandings: The unintended effects of precautionary information on perceived risks, the EMF case

Peter M. Wiedemann, Holger Schuetz, Franziska Boerner, Martin Clauberg, Rodney Croft, Rajesh Shukla, Toshiko Kikkawa, Ray Kemp, Jan M. Gutteling, Barney De Villiers, Flavia N. Da Silva Medeiros, Julie Barnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

In the past decade, growing public concern about novel technologies with uncertain potential long-term impacts on the environment and human health has moved risk policies toward a more precautionary approach. Focusing on mobile telephony, the effects of precautionary information on risk perception were analyzed. A pooled multinational experimental study based on a 5 × 2 × 2 factorial design was conducted in nine countries. The first factor refers to whether or not information on different types of precautionary measures was present, the second factor to the framing of the precautionary information, and the third factor to the order in which cell phones and base stations were rated by the study participants. The data analysis on the country level indicates different effects. The main hypothesis that informing about precautionary measures results in increased risk perceptions found only partial support in the data. The effects are weaker, both in terms of the effect size and the frequency of significant effects, across the various precautionary information formats used in the experiment. Nevertheless, our findings do not support the assumption that informing people about implemented precautionary measures will decrease public concerns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1788-1801
Number of pages14
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume33
Issue number10
Early online date28 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When precaution creates misunderstandings: The unintended effects of precautionary information on perceived risks, the EMF case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this