When pain in the arm is 'all in the head': The management of medically unexplained suffering in primary care

D Wainwright, M Calnan, C O'Neil, A Winterbottom, C Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cases of medically unexplained arm pain pose a dilemma for general practitioners. The absence of observable physical pathology implies a psychosocial problem, but patients often insist that their illness is bio-mechanical. Should the doctor risk invalidating the patient's claims and damaging the doctor patient relationship, by insisting on a psycho-social explanation, or follow the patient's wishes and prescribe treatments which are likely to be ineffective? Findings from a qualitative study of 14 general practitioners in the South West of England are presented and discussed in the context of the sociology of suffering. The findings indicate a high degree of clinical uncertainty in dealing with non-specific arm pain cases and identify a range of strategies adopted to manage this uncertainty and the problems associated with it. Critics of 'bio-medicine' have argued that it focuses narrowly on physical pathology, while neglecting the patient's subjective beliefs and emotional needs. Our findings question this view, suggesting that GPs are often prepared to set aside the rigour of clinical science and the search for physical pathology in order to avoid invalidating the patient's claim that their illness is bio-mechanical rather than psycho-social. While this conforms to cultural expectations of what constitutes an appropriate response to human suffering, it may not be in the patient's best interests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-88
Number of pages18
JournalHealth Risk & Society
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
Primary Health Care
Arm
Head
Pain
Pathology
General Practitioners
Uncertainty
Natural Science Disciplines
Sociology
England
Medicine

Cite this

When pain in the arm is 'all in the head': The management of medically unexplained suffering in primary care. / Wainwright, D; Calnan, M; O'Neil, C; Winterbottom, A; Watkins, C.

In: Health Risk & Society, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006, p. 71-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wainwright, D ; Calnan, M ; O'Neil, C ; Winterbottom, A ; Watkins, C. / When pain in the arm is 'all in the head': The management of medically unexplained suffering in primary care. In: Health Risk & Society. 2006 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 71-88.
@article{ed19092626bf420383fcaa14facdbed1,
title = "When pain in the arm is 'all in the head': The management of medically unexplained suffering in primary care",
abstract = "Cases of medically unexplained arm pain pose a dilemma for general practitioners. The absence of observable physical pathology implies a psychosocial problem, but patients often insist that their illness is bio-mechanical. Should the doctor risk invalidating the patient's claims and damaging the doctor patient relationship, by insisting on a psycho-social explanation, or follow the patient's wishes and prescribe treatments which are likely to be ineffective? Findings from a qualitative study of 14 general practitioners in the South West of England are presented and discussed in the context of the sociology of suffering. The findings indicate a high degree of clinical uncertainty in dealing with non-specific arm pain cases and identify a range of strategies adopted to manage this uncertainty and the problems associated with it. Critics of 'bio-medicine' have argued that it focuses narrowly on physical pathology, while neglecting the patient's subjective beliefs and emotional needs. Our findings question this view, suggesting that GPs are often prepared to set aside the rigour of clinical science and the search for physical pathology in order to avoid invalidating the patient's claim that their illness is bio-mechanical rather than psycho-social. While this conforms to cultural expectations of what constitutes an appropriate response to human suffering, it may not be in the patient's best interests.",
author = "D Wainwright and M Calnan and C O'Neil and A Winterbottom and C Watkins",
note = "ID number: ISI:000236129800006",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/13698570500532512",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "71--88",
journal = "Health Risk & Society",
issn = "1369-8575",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When pain in the arm is 'all in the head': The management of medically unexplained suffering in primary care

AU - Wainwright, D

AU - Calnan, M

AU - O'Neil, C

AU - Winterbottom, A

AU - Watkins, C

N1 - ID number: ISI:000236129800006

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Cases of medically unexplained arm pain pose a dilemma for general practitioners. The absence of observable physical pathology implies a psychosocial problem, but patients often insist that their illness is bio-mechanical. Should the doctor risk invalidating the patient's claims and damaging the doctor patient relationship, by insisting on a psycho-social explanation, or follow the patient's wishes and prescribe treatments which are likely to be ineffective? Findings from a qualitative study of 14 general practitioners in the South West of England are presented and discussed in the context of the sociology of suffering. The findings indicate a high degree of clinical uncertainty in dealing with non-specific arm pain cases and identify a range of strategies adopted to manage this uncertainty and the problems associated with it. Critics of 'bio-medicine' have argued that it focuses narrowly on physical pathology, while neglecting the patient's subjective beliefs and emotional needs. Our findings question this view, suggesting that GPs are often prepared to set aside the rigour of clinical science and the search for physical pathology in order to avoid invalidating the patient's claim that their illness is bio-mechanical rather than psycho-social. While this conforms to cultural expectations of what constitutes an appropriate response to human suffering, it may not be in the patient's best interests.

AB - Cases of medically unexplained arm pain pose a dilemma for general practitioners. The absence of observable physical pathology implies a psychosocial problem, but patients often insist that their illness is bio-mechanical. Should the doctor risk invalidating the patient's claims and damaging the doctor patient relationship, by insisting on a psycho-social explanation, or follow the patient's wishes and prescribe treatments which are likely to be ineffective? Findings from a qualitative study of 14 general practitioners in the South West of England are presented and discussed in the context of the sociology of suffering. The findings indicate a high degree of clinical uncertainty in dealing with non-specific arm pain cases and identify a range of strategies adopted to manage this uncertainty and the problems associated with it. Critics of 'bio-medicine' have argued that it focuses narrowly on physical pathology, while neglecting the patient's subjective beliefs and emotional needs. Our findings question this view, suggesting that GPs are often prepared to set aside the rigour of clinical science and the search for physical pathology in order to avoid invalidating the patient's claim that their illness is bio-mechanical rather than psycho-social. While this conforms to cultural expectations of what constitutes an appropriate response to human suffering, it may not be in the patient's best interests.

U2 - 10.1080/13698570500532512

DO - 10.1080/13698570500532512

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 71

EP - 88

JO - Health Risk & Society

JF - Health Risk & Society

SN - 1369-8575

IS - 1

ER -