What limits the morphological disparity of clades?

Jack Oyston, Martin Hughes, Peter Wagner, Sylvain Gerber, Matthew Wills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

The morphological disparity of species within major clades shows a variety of trajectory patterns through evolutionary time. However, there is a significant tendency for groups to reach their maximum disparity relatively early in their histories, even while their species richness or diversity is comparatively low. This pattern of early high-disparity suggests that there are internal constraints (e.g., developmental pleiotropy) or external restrictions (e.g., ecological competition) upon the variety of morphologies that can subsequently evolve. It has also been demonstrated that the rate of evolution of new character states decreases in most clades through time (character saturation), as does the rate of origination of novel bodyplans and higher taxa. Here we tested whether there was a simple relationship between the level or rate of character state exhaustion and the shape of a clade’s disparity profile; specifically its centre of gravity (CG). In a sample of 93 extinct major clades, most showed some degree of exhaustion, but all continued to evolve new states up until their extinction. Projection of states/steps curves suggested that clades realised an average of 60% of their inferred maximum numbers of states. Despite a weak but significant correlation between overall levels of homoplasy and the CG of clade disparity profiles, there were no significant relationships between any of our indices of exhaustion curve shape and the clade disparity CG. Clades showing early high-disparity were no more likely to have early character saturation than those with maximum disparity late in their evolution.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInterface Focus
Volume5
Issue number6
Early online date23 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What limits the morphological disparity of clades?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this