‘What is the self anyway?’ Towards a more parsimonious conceptualisation of the self: A review

Emily Hards, Clare J. Rathbone, Judi A. Ellis, Shirley Reynolds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The ‘self’ is of interest across multiple psychological, cognitive, and social sciences. Unhelpfully, a plethora of terms are used across different theoretical and empirical areas. This leads to inconsistency, confusion and lack of clarity and impedes cross-disciplinary communication and progress. To improve clarity, increase parsimony and support theoretical and empirical advances, it is important to establish clear terms that can be applied consistently across psychology. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive initial inventory of synthesised self-terms that can be used by, and across psychology. We review self-terms used across different areas in psychology and identify a set of terms that are most frequently and consistently used across these domains. We then present a synthesis of commonly used ‘self-terms’ that are specifically related to six psychological sub-disciplines; Cognitive, Social, Developmental, Neuroscience, Clinical and Personality psychology. A glossary of self-terms, together with frequently used synonymous self-terms are presented.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101080
Number of pages10
JournalNew Ideas in Psychology
Volume74
Early online date22 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article

Funding

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council; Dr Hards is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC Post Doctoral Fellowship, ES/W006332/1).

FundersFunder number
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/W006332/1

Keywords

  • Identity
  • Self
  • Self-concept
  • Self-esteem
  • Self-knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘What is the self anyway?’ Towards a more parsimonious conceptualisation of the self: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this