What is architectural management?

towards a pragmatic definition

Mohammed Alharbi, Stephen Emmitt, Peter Demian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
101 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose – To provide a pragmatic definition of Architectural Management derived from systematic research.
Design/methodology/approach – A triangulated approach to data collection was employed, comprising a number of sequential stages. First, a literature review was carried out to analyse the previous attempts to define the term. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted (online questionnaire) to capture the current interpretations of the term. After that, a new definition was formulated based on analysing and synthesising the collected data. The fourth stage was focused on examining the consistency of the new definition through the perspectives of architectural researchers and practitioners. The final stage was refining the definition based on the feedback.
Findings – After following a pragmatic approach for constructing a new definition of Architectural Management (AM); and based on the results of the several testing stages, it was found that AM is associated with the strategic management of the architectural office and its individual projects; and it is responsible for value design and delivery for its adopter and for the different types of stakeholders.
Research Limitations – Although there was some quantitative testing in addition to the qualitative data the response rate was low in terms of the population of UK architectural practices.
Originality/value – The outcome is the first definition of Architectural Management grounded in research. The research is unique in terms of reviewing the scope and limitations of the previous definitions of AM. Based on the research findings, the new definition of AM was found to offer an accepted description of Architectural Management that can be used by both researchers, educators and practising architects. The definition provides a common understanding (vocabulary) for those working in the area of Architectural Management.
Keywords - Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.
Article Classification – Research Paper
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-168
Number of pages18
JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Testing
Refining
Feedback
Questionnaire
Response rate
Key words
Stakeholders
Literature review
Data collection
Strategic management
Qualitative data
Reviewing
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.

Cite this

What is architectural management? towards a pragmatic definition. / Alharbi, Mohammed; Emmitt, Stephen; Demian, Peter.

In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2015, p. 151-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d90e5d3fb86a47dc83f039104919f9c0,
title = "What is architectural management?: towards a pragmatic definition",
abstract = "Purpose – To provide a pragmatic definition of Architectural Management derived from systematic research.Design/methodology/approach – A triangulated approach to data collection was employed, comprising a number of sequential stages. First, a literature review was carried out to analyse the previous attempts to define the term. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted (online questionnaire) to capture the current interpretations of the term. After that, a new definition was formulated based on analysing and synthesising the collected data. The fourth stage was focused on examining the consistency of the new definition through the perspectives of architectural researchers and practitioners. The final stage was refining the definition based on the feedback.Findings – After following a pragmatic approach for constructing a new definition of Architectural Management (AM); and based on the results of the several testing stages, it was found that AM is associated with the strategic management of the architectural office and its individual projects; and it is responsible for value design and delivery for its adopter and for the different types of stakeholders.Research Limitations – Although there was some quantitative testing in addition to the qualitative data the response rate was low in terms of the population of UK architectural practices.Originality/value – The outcome is the first definition of Architectural Management grounded in research. The research is unique in terms of reviewing the scope and limitations of the previous definitions of AM. Based on the research findings, the new definition of AM was found to offer an accepted description of Architectural Management that can be used by both researchers, educators and practising architects. The definition provides a common understanding (vocabulary) for those working in the area of Architectural Management.Keywords - Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.Article Classification – Research Paper",
keywords = "Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.",
author = "Mohammed Alharbi and Stephen Emmitt and Peter Demian",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/ECAM-05-2014-0068",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "151--168",
journal = "Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management",
issn = "0969-9988",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is architectural management?

T2 - towards a pragmatic definition

AU - Alharbi, Mohammed

AU - Emmitt, Stephen

AU - Demian, Peter

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose – To provide a pragmatic definition of Architectural Management derived from systematic research.Design/methodology/approach – A triangulated approach to data collection was employed, comprising a number of sequential stages. First, a literature review was carried out to analyse the previous attempts to define the term. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted (online questionnaire) to capture the current interpretations of the term. After that, a new definition was formulated based on analysing and synthesising the collected data. The fourth stage was focused on examining the consistency of the new definition through the perspectives of architectural researchers and practitioners. The final stage was refining the definition based on the feedback.Findings – After following a pragmatic approach for constructing a new definition of Architectural Management (AM); and based on the results of the several testing stages, it was found that AM is associated with the strategic management of the architectural office and its individual projects; and it is responsible for value design and delivery for its adopter and for the different types of stakeholders.Research Limitations – Although there was some quantitative testing in addition to the qualitative data the response rate was low in terms of the population of UK architectural practices.Originality/value – The outcome is the first definition of Architectural Management grounded in research. The research is unique in terms of reviewing the scope and limitations of the previous definitions of AM. Based on the research findings, the new definition of AM was found to offer an accepted description of Architectural Management that can be used by both researchers, educators and practising architects. The definition provides a common understanding (vocabulary) for those working in the area of Architectural Management.Keywords - Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.Article Classification – Research Paper

AB - Purpose – To provide a pragmatic definition of Architectural Management derived from systematic research.Design/methodology/approach – A triangulated approach to data collection was employed, comprising a number of sequential stages. First, a literature review was carried out to analyse the previous attempts to define the term. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted (online questionnaire) to capture the current interpretations of the term. After that, a new definition was formulated based on analysing and synthesising the collected data. The fourth stage was focused on examining the consistency of the new definition through the perspectives of architectural researchers and practitioners. The final stage was refining the definition based on the feedback.Findings – After following a pragmatic approach for constructing a new definition of Architectural Management (AM); and based on the results of the several testing stages, it was found that AM is associated with the strategic management of the architectural office and its individual projects; and it is responsible for value design and delivery for its adopter and for the different types of stakeholders.Research Limitations – Although there was some quantitative testing in addition to the qualitative data the response rate was low in terms of the population of UK architectural practices.Originality/value – The outcome is the first definition of Architectural Management grounded in research. The research is unique in terms of reviewing the scope and limitations of the previous definitions of AM. Based on the research findings, the new definition of AM was found to offer an accepted description of Architectural Management that can be used by both researchers, educators and practising architects. The definition provides a common understanding (vocabulary) for those working in the area of Architectural Management.Keywords - Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.Article Classification – Research Paper

KW - Architectural Management, architectural practice, definition, impact.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2014-0068

U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-05-2014-0068

DO - 10.1108/ECAM-05-2014-0068

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 151

EP - 168

JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

SN - 0969-9988

IS - 2

ER -