What Does the Heckscher-Ohlin Model Contribute to International Trade Theory? A Critical Assessment

Turan Subasat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Heckscher-Ohlin theory of comparative advantage was produced as an alternative to the Ricardian model and had an ideological mission: the elimination of the labor theory of value and the incorporation of the neoclassical price mechanism into international trade theory. This article first questions the empirical validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model and argues that most of the empirical work aimed at proving the validity of the model by focusing on its power to predict trade patterns is irrelevant. Moreover, the dynamic version of the model, which predicts dynamic structural change in the long run, is based on simple empiricism. Second, it exposes the theoretical weaknesses of the model by questioning its treatment of capital and labor. Finally, it challenges the view that the model surpasses the Ricardian model in its ability to predict patterns of trade between low- and high-income countries by demonstrating that the Ricardian model would also anticipate similar trade patterns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-65
Number of pages18
JournalReview of Radical Political Economics
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

International trade theory
Heckscher-Ohlin model
International Trade
Ricardian model
Trade patterns
Heckscher-Ohlin theory
Price mechanism
Labor theory of value
Low income
Structural change
Pattern of trade
Empiricism
Labor
Comparative advantage
Income
Comparative Advantage
Questioning
Labor Theory of Value
Structural Change

Keywords

  • Neoclassical Models of Trade

Cite this

What Does the Heckscher-Ohlin Model Contribute to International Trade Theory? A Critical Assessment. / Subasat, Turan.

In: Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2003, p. 148-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{accfaa9ab40143d1b5c74d4673e92121,
title = "What Does the Heckscher-Ohlin Model Contribute to International Trade Theory? A Critical Assessment",
abstract = "The Heckscher-Ohlin theory of comparative advantage was produced as an alternative to the Ricardian model and had an ideological mission: the elimination of the labor theory of value and the incorporation of the neoclassical price mechanism into international trade theory. This article first questions the empirical validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model and argues that most of the empirical work aimed at proving the validity of the model by focusing on its power to predict trade patterns is irrelevant. Moreover, the dynamic version of the model, which predicts dynamic structural change in the long run, is based on simple empiricism. Second, it exposes the theoretical weaknesses of the model by questioning its treatment of capital and labor. Finally, it challenges the view that the model surpasses the Ricardian model in its ability to predict patterns of trade between low- and high-income countries by demonstrating that the Ricardian model would also anticipate similar trade patterns.",
keywords = "Neoclassical Models of Trade",
author = "Turan Subasat",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1177/0486613403035002003",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "148--65",
journal = "Review of Radical Political Economics",
issn = "0486-6134",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Does the Heckscher-Ohlin Model Contribute to International Trade Theory? A Critical Assessment

AU - Subasat, Turan

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The Heckscher-Ohlin theory of comparative advantage was produced as an alternative to the Ricardian model and had an ideological mission: the elimination of the labor theory of value and the incorporation of the neoclassical price mechanism into international trade theory. This article first questions the empirical validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model and argues that most of the empirical work aimed at proving the validity of the model by focusing on its power to predict trade patterns is irrelevant. Moreover, the dynamic version of the model, which predicts dynamic structural change in the long run, is based on simple empiricism. Second, it exposes the theoretical weaknesses of the model by questioning its treatment of capital and labor. Finally, it challenges the view that the model surpasses the Ricardian model in its ability to predict patterns of trade between low- and high-income countries by demonstrating that the Ricardian model would also anticipate similar trade patterns.

AB - The Heckscher-Ohlin theory of comparative advantage was produced as an alternative to the Ricardian model and had an ideological mission: the elimination of the labor theory of value and the incorporation of the neoclassical price mechanism into international trade theory. This article first questions the empirical validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model and argues that most of the empirical work aimed at proving the validity of the model by focusing on its power to predict trade patterns is irrelevant. Moreover, the dynamic version of the model, which predicts dynamic structural change in the long run, is based on simple empiricism. Second, it exposes the theoretical weaknesses of the model by questioning its treatment of capital and labor. Finally, it challenges the view that the model surpasses the Ricardian model in its ability to predict patterns of trade between low- and high-income countries by demonstrating that the Ricardian model would also anticipate similar trade patterns.

KW - Neoclassical Models of Trade

U2 - 10.1177/0486613403035002003

DO - 10.1177/0486613403035002003

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 148

EP - 165

JO - Review of Radical Political Economics

JF - Review of Radical Political Economics

SN - 0486-6134

IS - 2

ER -