What determines the return to education: an extra year or a hurdle cleared?

Matt Dickson, Sarah Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1973 Raising of the School Leaving Age from 15 to 16 has been used to identify returns to years’ schooling. However, because the first set of “high stakes” exams are taken in the UK at age 16, the reform affected the proportion with qualifications, as well as schooling length. In order to shed light on whether the returns reflect the extra length of schooling or the increase in qualifications, we exploit another institutional rule – the Easter Leaving Rule – which we argue only affected the probability of obtaining qualifications (and not the length of schooling). We find sizeable returns to academic qualifications – increasing the probability of employment by 40% points – and our results suggest that qualifications drive most of the returns to education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1167-1176
Number of pages10
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What determines the return to education: an extra year or a hurdle cleared?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this