"We don't want to go and be idle ducks": family practices at the end of life

Erica Borgstrom, Julie Ellis, Kate Woodthorpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

At present end of life research, policy and practice typically prioritises the dying individual and considers the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, whilst sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this paper argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.
LanguageEnglish
JournalSociology
Early online date24 Apr 2019
DOIs
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • dying
  • end of life
  • ethnography
  • everyday
  • family
  • family practice

Cite this

"We don't want to go and be idle ducks": family practices at the end of life. / Borgstrom, Erica; Ellis, Julie; Woodthorpe, Kate.

In: Sociology, 24.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffbd8401a05845a7999dc37f6d0766ee,
title = "{"}We don't want to go and be idle ducks{"}: family practices at the end of life",
abstract = "At present end of life research, policy and practice typically prioritises the dying individual and considers the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, whilst sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this paper argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.",
keywords = "dying, end of life, ethnography, everyday, family, family practice",
author = "Erica Borgstrom and Julie Ellis and Kate Woodthorpe",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1177/0038038519841828",
language = "English",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "We don't want to go and be idle ducks": family practices at the end of life

AU - Borgstrom, Erica

AU - Ellis, Julie

AU - Woodthorpe, Kate

PY - 2019/4/24

Y1 - 2019/4/24

N2 - At present end of life research, policy and practice typically prioritises the dying individual and considers the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, whilst sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this paper argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.

AB - At present end of life research, policy and practice typically prioritises the dying individual and considers the family an orbiting static unit. Sociological theorising of dying has reflected this trend, focusing on the macro-level and public rather than private sphere, whilst sociologists engaged in the study of family and relationships overlooking the end of life altogether. In addressing this gap, this paper argues that the end of life is a relational experience in which everyday family practices are embedded and enacted. Drawing on two ethnographic studies, it demonstrates some of the ways in which family is actively ‘done’ at this time, principally in the transference of family practices into institutional settings, and shared decision making. In doing so it makes a case for moving beyond a highly individualised emphasis on the person nearing the end of their life and an accompanying normative conceptualisation of family, towards an understanding that families (in all their diversity) and their continued (un)making are central to the experience.

KW - dying

KW - end of life

KW - ethnography

KW - everyday

KW - family

KW - family practice

U2 - 10.1177/0038038519841828

DO - 10.1177/0038038519841828

M3 - Article

JO - Sociology

T2 - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

ER -