"We don’t need no education” – or do we?: Management education and alumni adoption of strategy tools

Paula Jarzabkowski, Monica Giulietti, Bruno Oliveira, Nii Amoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite concerns about the relevance of management education, there is relatively little evidence about whether graduates use the management tools and concepts they are taught. We address this gap with evidence from a survey of business school alumni adoption of tools typically taught in strategic management courses. Our findings show that four educational characteristics—level of formal education, frequency of management training, specificity of strategic management education, and time elapsed since formal education—drive adoption of strategy tools. Specifically, features such as postgraduate over undergraduate qualifications and frequent exposure to management training predispose greater user of strategy tools. However, other factors, such as time elapsed since formal education, are not as great a predictor of variation in use. We conclude with a predictive model of the relative weight and importance of educational and demographic characteristics on strategy tool adoption and discuss our findings in light of the relevance debate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages4-24
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date29 Oct 2012
DOIs
StatusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Education
OR education
Management education
Industry
Strategic management
Management training

Cite this

"We don’t need no education” – or do we? Management education and alumni adoption of strategy tools. / Jarzabkowski, Paula; Giulietti, Monica; Oliveira, Bruno; Amoo, Nii.

In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 4-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e14e1f779a74501bf4a8bd2cf8269ff,
title = "{"}We don’t need no education” – or do we?: Management education and alumni adoption of strategy tools",
abstract = "Despite concerns about the relevance of management education, there is relatively little evidence about whether graduates use the management tools and concepts they are taught. We address this gap with evidence from a survey of business school alumni adoption of tools typically taught in strategic management courses. Our findings show that four educational characteristics—level of formal education, frequency of management training, specificity of strategic management education, and time elapsed since formal education—drive adoption of strategy tools. Specifically, features such as postgraduate over undergraduate qualifications and frequent exposure to management training predispose greater user of strategy tools. However, other factors, such as time elapsed since formal education, are not as great a predictor of variation in use. We conclude with a predictive model of the relative weight and importance of educational and demographic characteristics on strategy tool adoption and discuss our findings in light of the relevance debate.",
author = "Paula Jarzabkowski and Monica Giulietti and Bruno Oliveira and Nii Amoo",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1056492612460588",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "4--24",
journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
issn = "1056-4926",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "We don’t need no education” – or do we?

T2 - Journal of Management Inquiry

AU - Jarzabkowski, Paula

AU - Giulietti, Monica

AU - Oliveira, Bruno

AU - Amoo, Nii

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Despite concerns about the relevance of management education, there is relatively little evidence about whether graduates use the management tools and concepts they are taught. We address this gap with evidence from a survey of business school alumni adoption of tools typically taught in strategic management courses. Our findings show that four educational characteristics—level of formal education, frequency of management training, specificity of strategic management education, and time elapsed since formal education—drive adoption of strategy tools. Specifically, features such as postgraduate over undergraduate qualifications and frequent exposure to management training predispose greater user of strategy tools. However, other factors, such as time elapsed since formal education, are not as great a predictor of variation in use. We conclude with a predictive model of the relative weight and importance of educational and demographic characteristics on strategy tool adoption and discuss our findings in light of the relevance debate.

AB - Despite concerns about the relevance of management education, there is relatively little evidence about whether graduates use the management tools and concepts they are taught. We address this gap with evidence from a survey of business school alumni adoption of tools typically taught in strategic management courses. Our findings show that four educational characteristics—level of formal education, frequency of management training, specificity of strategic management education, and time elapsed since formal education—drive adoption of strategy tools. Specifically, features such as postgraduate over undergraduate qualifications and frequent exposure to management training predispose greater user of strategy tools. However, other factors, such as time elapsed since formal education, are not as great a predictor of variation in use. We conclude with a predictive model of the relative weight and importance of educational and demographic characteristics on strategy tool adoption and discuss our findings in light of the relevance debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871253789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492612460588

U2 - 10.1177/1056492612460588

DO - 10.1177/1056492612460588

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 4

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

SN - 1056-4926

IS - 1

ER -