Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Poor working conditions remain a serious problem in supplier facilities in developing countries. While previous research has explored this from the developed buyers’ side, we examine this phenomenon from the perspective of developing countries’ suppliers and subcontractors. Utilizing qualitative data from a major knitwear exporting cluster in India and a stakeholder management lens, we develop a framework that shows how the assumptions of conventional, buyer-driven voluntary governance break down in the dilution of buyer power and in the web of factors rooted in suppliers’ traditions, beliefs, local demands and resource dependency. We reveal out how success in governing collaborative global supply chains often falls short within the subcontracting stage, where a stakeholder management mindset is elusive to most participants. We suggest that success in governing collaborative global supply chains is dependent on concepts of stakeholder utility and the presence of shared value that is often at odds with the realities of power, information asymmetry and compliance/reward systems inherent in the non-market coordination of global supply chains. Our findings offer important insights for delineating the concepts of value creation from CSR concepts and practices, and for modifying the basic assumptions of conventional supply chain governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-102
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume134
Issue number1
Early online date11 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Cooperative governance
  • Stakeholders
  • Voluntary governance mechanisms
  • Global supply chain
  • Developing countries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary governance mechanisms in global supply chains: Beyond CSR to a stakeholder utility perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this