Voluntary audits versus mandatory audits

Clive S. Lennox, Jeffrey A. Pittman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

129 Citations (SciVal)


Exploiting a natural experiment in which voluntary audits replace mandatory audits for U.K. private companies, we analyze whether imposing audits suppresses valuable information about the types of companies that would voluntarily choose to be audited. We control for the assurance benefits of auditing to isolate the role signaling plays by focusing on companies that are audited under both regimes. These companies experience no change in audit assurance, although they can now reveal for the first time their desire to be audited. We find that these companies attract upgrades to their credit ratings because they send a positive signal by submitting to an audit when this is no longer legally required. In contrast, companies that dispense with being audited suffer downgrades to their ratings because avoiding an audit sends a negative signal and removes its assurance value.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1655-1678
Number of pages24
JournalAccounting Review
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary audits versus mandatory audits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this