Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet

D C Gooding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Case studies of diverse scientific fields show how scientists use a range of resources to generate new interpretative models and to establish their plausibility as explanations of a domain. They accomplish this by manipulating imagistic representations in particular ways. I show that scientists in different domains use the same basic transformations. Common features of these transformations indicate that general cognitive strategies of interpretation, simplification, elaboration, and argumentation are at work. Social and historical studies of science emphasize the diversity of local contexts of practice. However, the existence of common strategies shows that this diversity masks an important repertoire of cognitive strategies. Scientists use this repertoire to adapt their representations to meet the cognitive demands of different contexts of practice. This paper considers the implications of this finding for the notion of scientists as cognitive agents in distributed knowledge-producing systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)688-698
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume73
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Cognition
Cognitive Strategies
Repertoire
Argumentation
Plausibility
Simplification
Knowledge System
Resources
Mask
Elaboration

Cite this

Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet. / Gooding, D C.

In: Philosophy of Science, Vol. 73, No. 5, 2006, p. 688-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gooding, DC 2006, 'Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet', Philosophy of Science, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 688-698.
Gooding, D C. / Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet. In: Philosophy of Science. 2006 ; Vol. 73, No. 5. pp. 688-698.
@article{df9afcf1c2a144018bdb46457ad431d7,
title = "Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet",
abstract = "Case studies of diverse scientific fields show how scientists use a range of resources to generate new interpretative models and to establish their plausibility as explanations of a domain. They accomplish this by manipulating imagistic representations in particular ways. I show that scientists in different domains use the same basic transformations. Common features of these transformations indicate that general cognitive strategies of interpretation, simplification, elaboration, and argumentation are at work. Social and historical studies of science emphasize the diversity of local contexts of practice. However, the existence of common strategies shows that this diversity masks an important repertoire of cognitive strategies. Scientists use this repertoire to adapt their representations to meet the cognitive demands of different contexts of practice. This paper considers the implications of this finding for the notion of scientists as cognitive agents in distributed knowledge-producing systems.",
author = "Gooding, {D C}",
note = "ID number: ISI:000249037400020",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "688--698",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual cognition: Where cognition and culture meet

AU - Gooding, D C

N1 - ID number: ISI:000249037400020

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Case studies of diverse scientific fields show how scientists use a range of resources to generate new interpretative models and to establish their plausibility as explanations of a domain. They accomplish this by manipulating imagistic representations in particular ways. I show that scientists in different domains use the same basic transformations. Common features of these transformations indicate that general cognitive strategies of interpretation, simplification, elaboration, and argumentation are at work. Social and historical studies of science emphasize the diversity of local contexts of practice. However, the existence of common strategies shows that this diversity masks an important repertoire of cognitive strategies. Scientists use this repertoire to adapt their representations to meet the cognitive demands of different contexts of practice. This paper considers the implications of this finding for the notion of scientists as cognitive agents in distributed knowledge-producing systems.

AB - Case studies of diverse scientific fields show how scientists use a range of resources to generate new interpretative models and to establish their plausibility as explanations of a domain. They accomplish this by manipulating imagistic representations in particular ways. I show that scientists in different domains use the same basic transformations. Common features of these transformations indicate that general cognitive strategies of interpretation, simplification, elaboration, and argumentation are at work. Social and historical studies of science emphasize the diversity of local contexts of practice. However, the existence of common strategies shows that this diversity masks an important repertoire of cognitive strategies. Scientists use this repertoire to adapt their representations to meet the cognitive demands of different contexts of practice. This paper considers the implications of this finding for the notion of scientists as cognitive agents in distributed knowledge-producing systems.

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 688

EP - 698

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 5

ER -