Variations in non-locking screw insertion conditions generate unpredictable changes to achieved fixation tightness and stripping rates

James Fletcher, Verena Neumann, Lisa Wenzel, Boyko Gueorguiev, R. Geoff Richards, Richie Gill, Michael R. Whitehouse, Ezio Preatoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (SciVal)
18 Downloads (Pure)


Background Screws are the most commonly inserted orthopaedic implants. However, several variables related to screw insertion and tightening have not been evaluated. This study aimed firstly to assess the effect of insertion variables on screw tightness, secondly to improve methodologies used by researchers when testing screw insertion techniques and thirdly to assess for any learning or fatigue effects when inserting screws. Methods Two surgeons tightened a total of 2280 non-locking, 3.5 mm cortical screws, with 120 screws inserted to what they felt to be optimum tightness whilst varying each of the following factors: different screwdrivers for measuring torque, screwdriver orientation, gloves usage, dominant/non-dominant hand usage, awareness to the applied torque (blinded, unblinded and re-blinded), four bone densities and seven cortical thicknesses. Screws were tightened to failure to determine stripping torque, which was used to calculate screw tightness – ratio between stopping and stripping torque. Findings Screw tightness increased with glove usage, being blinded to the applied torque and with denser artificial bone and with thinner cortices. Considering all the insertions performed, the two surgeons stopped tightening screws at difference values of tightness ((77% versus 66% (p < 0.001)). A learning effect was observed with some parameters including sterile gloves usage and non-dominant hand application. Interpretation Different insertion conditions frequently changed screw tightness for both surgeons. Given the influence of screw tightness on fixation stability, the variables investigated within this study should be carefully reported and controlled when performing biomechanical testing alongside practicing screw insertion under different conditions during surgical training.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105201
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Early online date23 Oct 2020
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020


  • Screw
  • tightness
  • stripping
  • non-locking
  • torque


Dive into the research topics of 'Variations in non-locking screw insertion conditions generate unpredictable changes to achieved fixation tightness and stripping rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this