Using guided individualised feedback to review self-reported quality of life in health and its importance

Alison M. Llewellyn, Suzanne M. Skevington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This pilot study investigated the effects of providing guided, individualised feedback on subjective quality of life (QoL), using results from the multidimensional WHOQOL-BREF profile. Participants (n = 129; 85 chronically ill) were recruited in the community, and primary care. They were randomised to receive written or verbal guidance on interpreting a new graphical summary profile, which simultaneously presented (a) their individual self-ratings of QoL and (b) the importance attributed to each QoL dimension. Before and after feedback, participants completed health status, subjective QoL, QoL Importance, goal-oriented QoL and mood measures. Receiving individualised feedback was associated with increased psychological QoL, with modest effect size. No effects were found for physical, social or environmental QoL or QoL importance, health status, mood or goal-oriented QoL. There were no differences between modes of delivering guidance, indicating equal effectiveness. Chronic illness participants reported poorer QoL, moved more slowly towards their QoL goals, and had larger differences between core QoL and QoL Importance than healthy participants. Guided individualised empirical feedback about QoL judgements could be used to promote psychological well-being. Although professional interpretation of feedback is unnecessary, if shared, patients’ profiled WHOQOL information could support self-monitoring, self-management and clinical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-317
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date30 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Health
Health Status
Chronic Disease
Psychology
Self Care
Primary Health Care
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • feedback
  • health
  • quality of life
  • well-being
  • WHOQOL-BREF

Cite this

Using guided individualised feedback to review self-reported quality of life in health and its importance. / Llewellyn, Alison M.; Skevington, Suzanne M.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2015, p. 301-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Llewellyn, Alison M. ; Skevington, Suzanne M. / Using guided individualised feedback to review self-reported quality of life in health and its importance. In: Psychology and Health. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 301-317.
@article{26654df21cf74e82be631356167257c2,
title = "Using guided individualised feedback to review self-reported quality of life in health and its importance",
abstract = "This pilot study investigated the effects of providing guided, individualised feedback on subjective quality of life (QoL), using results from the multidimensional WHOQOL-BREF profile. Participants (n = 129; 85 chronically ill) were recruited in the community, and primary care. They were randomised to receive written or verbal guidance on interpreting a new graphical summary profile, which simultaneously presented (a) their individual self-ratings of QoL and (b) the importance attributed to each QoL dimension. Before and after feedback, participants completed health status, subjective QoL, QoL Importance, goal-oriented QoL and mood measures. Receiving individualised feedback was associated with increased psychological QoL, with modest effect size. No effects were found for physical, social or environmental QoL or QoL importance, health status, mood or goal-oriented QoL. There were no differences between modes of delivering guidance, indicating equal effectiveness. Chronic illness participants reported poorer QoL, moved more slowly towards their QoL goals, and had larger differences between core QoL and QoL Importance than healthy participants. Guided individualised empirical feedback about QoL judgements could be used to promote psychological well-being. Although professional interpretation of feedback is unnecessary, if shared, patients’ profiled WHOQOL information could support self-monitoring, self-management and clinical decision-making.",
keywords = "feedback, health, quality of life, well-being, WHOQOL-BREF",
author = "Llewellyn, {Alison M.} and Skevington, {Suzanne M.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2014.972396",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "301--317",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using guided individualised feedback to review self-reported quality of life in health and its importance

AU - Llewellyn, Alison M.

AU - Skevington, Suzanne M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This pilot study investigated the effects of providing guided, individualised feedback on subjective quality of life (QoL), using results from the multidimensional WHOQOL-BREF profile. Participants (n = 129; 85 chronically ill) were recruited in the community, and primary care. They were randomised to receive written or verbal guidance on interpreting a new graphical summary profile, which simultaneously presented (a) their individual self-ratings of QoL and (b) the importance attributed to each QoL dimension. Before and after feedback, participants completed health status, subjective QoL, QoL Importance, goal-oriented QoL and mood measures. Receiving individualised feedback was associated with increased psychological QoL, with modest effect size. No effects were found for physical, social or environmental QoL or QoL importance, health status, mood or goal-oriented QoL. There were no differences between modes of delivering guidance, indicating equal effectiveness. Chronic illness participants reported poorer QoL, moved more slowly towards their QoL goals, and had larger differences between core QoL and QoL Importance than healthy participants. Guided individualised empirical feedback about QoL judgements could be used to promote psychological well-being. Although professional interpretation of feedback is unnecessary, if shared, patients’ profiled WHOQOL information could support self-monitoring, self-management and clinical decision-making.

AB - This pilot study investigated the effects of providing guided, individualised feedback on subjective quality of life (QoL), using results from the multidimensional WHOQOL-BREF profile. Participants (n = 129; 85 chronically ill) were recruited in the community, and primary care. They were randomised to receive written or verbal guidance on interpreting a new graphical summary profile, which simultaneously presented (a) their individual self-ratings of QoL and (b) the importance attributed to each QoL dimension. Before and after feedback, participants completed health status, subjective QoL, QoL Importance, goal-oriented QoL and mood measures. Receiving individualised feedback was associated with increased psychological QoL, with modest effect size. No effects were found for physical, social or environmental QoL or QoL importance, health status, mood or goal-oriented QoL. There were no differences between modes of delivering guidance, indicating equal effectiveness. Chronic illness participants reported poorer QoL, moved more slowly towards their QoL goals, and had larger differences between core QoL and QoL Importance than healthy participants. Guided individualised empirical feedback about QoL judgements could be used to promote psychological well-being. Although professional interpretation of feedback is unnecessary, if shared, patients’ profiled WHOQOL information could support self-monitoring, self-management and clinical decision-making.

KW - feedback

KW - health

KW - quality of life

KW - well-being

KW - WHOQOL-BREF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908322080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.972396

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2014.972396

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2014.972396

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 301

EP - 317

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 3

ER -