Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to introduce a methodology that enables researchers to employ a set of systematic comparative tools and techniques in their multiple case study research that allow them to move from drawing loose comparisons towards a more formalised type of analysis, while simultaneously paying attention to within-case complexities. This methodology stands between the qualitative and the quantitative methods and helps researchers to build middle-range theories (Mjoset, 2001) from small to intermediate numbers of cases. This methodology encompasses a number of techniques including crisp and fuzzy set-theoretic qualitative comparative analyses, which have been used in a wide range of social science disciplines. However, these techniques have not received sufficient attention from higher education scholars.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-182 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | International Perspectives on Higher Education Research |
| Volume | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using crisp and fuzzy set-theoretic analyses for middle-range theorising: a configurational comparative approach to case-based research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS