Use of clinical guidelines in cardiology practice in Sudan

Hwaida Elsadig, Marjorie Weiss, Jenny Scott, Raisa Laaksonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale, aims, and objective: The aim of this study was to explore the views of prescribers in cardiology in Sudan about the use of guidelines in clinical practice and the extent to which guidelines whether national or international can be adopted in clinical practice in Sudan. Methods: Interviews were conducted with the consultants in 2 of the main cardiac hospitals in Sudan. This was followed by a survey amongst the doctors in the hospitals to examine the views of a larger population of prescribers about the matter investigated. Results: Twelve consultants were interviewed, and 47 prescribers (60%) replied to the questionnaire that followed. Most doctors relied on foreign guidelines to prescribe for their patients. The doctors acknowledged the limitation of using foreign guidelines in Sudan. A number of doctors were not in favour of following any guidelines, as they perceived that the practice in Sudan does not allow implementation of guidelines. Conclusion: The prescribers in Sudan had to rely on guidelines made in foreign countries if they want to get the benefit of evidence-based medicine to their patients, but they had to find a way to adapt these guidelines to their patients and to the health care system they are working within. However, it is not known if this adaptation of foreign guidelines is providing the benefits intended or is risking evidence-based medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-134
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date6 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Sudan
Cardiology
Guidelines
Evidence-Based Medicine
Consultants
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • cardiology
  • doctors
  • guidelines
  • health care system
  • prescribing
  • Sudan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Use of clinical guidelines in cardiology practice in Sudan. / Elsadig, Hwaida; Weiss, Marjorie; Scott, Jenny; Laaksonen, Raisa.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 127-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elsadig, Hwaida ; Weiss, Marjorie ; Scott, Jenny ; Laaksonen, Raisa. / Use of clinical guidelines in cardiology practice in Sudan. In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 127-134.
@article{1a7fd6bf327046998c65f69673174dca,
title = "Use of clinical guidelines in cardiology practice in Sudan",
abstract = "Rationale, aims, and objective: The aim of this study was to explore the views of prescribers in cardiology in Sudan about the use of guidelines in clinical practice and the extent to which guidelines whether national or international can be adopted in clinical practice in Sudan. Methods: Interviews were conducted with the consultants in 2 of the main cardiac hospitals in Sudan. This was followed by a survey amongst the doctors in the hospitals to examine the views of a larger population of prescribers about the matter investigated. Results: Twelve consultants were interviewed, and 47 prescribers (60{\%}) replied to the questionnaire that followed. Most doctors relied on foreign guidelines to prescribe for their patients. The doctors acknowledged the limitation of using foreign guidelines in Sudan. A number of doctors were not in favour of following any guidelines, as they perceived that the practice in Sudan does not allow implementation of guidelines. Conclusion: The prescribers in Sudan had to rely on guidelines made in foreign countries if they want to get the benefit of evidence-based medicine to their patients, but they had to find a way to adapt these guidelines to their patients and to the health care system they are working within. However, it is not known if this adaptation of foreign guidelines is providing the benefits intended or is risking evidence-based medicine.",
keywords = "cardiology, doctors, guidelines, health care system, prescribing, Sudan",
author = "Hwaida Elsadig and Marjorie Weiss and Jenny Scott and Raisa Laaksonen",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jep.12746",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "127--134",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinial Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of clinical guidelines in cardiology practice in Sudan

AU - Elsadig, Hwaida

AU - Weiss, Marjorie

AU - Scott, Jenny

AU - Laaksonen, Raisa

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Rationale, aims, and objective: The aim of this study was to explore the views of prescribers in cardiology in Sudan about the use of guidelines in clinical practice and the extent to which guidelines whether national or international can be adopted in clinical practice in Sudan. Methods: Interviews were conducted with the consultants in 2 of the main cardiac hospitals in Sudan. This was followed by a survey amongst the doctors in the hospitals to examine the views of a larger population of prescribers about the matter investigated. Results: Twelve consultants were interviewed, and 47 prescribers (60%) replied to the questionnaire that followed. Most doctors relied on foreign guidelines to prescribe for their patients. The doctors acknowledged the limitation of using foreign guidelines in Sudan. A number of doctors were not in favour of following any guidelines, as they perceived that the practice in Sudan does not allow implementation of guidelines. Conclusion: The prescribers in Sudan had to rely on guidelines made in foreign countries if they want to get the benefit of evidence-based medicine to their patients, but they had to find a way to adapt these guidelines to their patients and to the health care system they are working within. However, it is not known if this adaptation of foreign guidelines is providing the benefits intended or is risking evidence-based medicine.

AB - Rationale, aims, and objective: The aim of this study was to explore the views of prescribers in cardiology in Sudan about the use of guidelines in clinical practice and the extent to which guidelines whether national or international can be adopted in clinical practice in Sudan. Methods: Interviews were conducted with the consultants in 2 of the main cardiac hospitals in Sudan. This was followed by a survey amongst the doctors in the hospitals to examine the views of a larger population of prescribers about the matter investigated. Results: Twelve consultants were interviewed, and 47 prescribers (60%) replied to the questionnaire that followed. Most doctors relied on foreign guidelines to prescribe for their patients. The doctors acknowledged the limitation of using foreign guidelines in Sudan. A number of doctors were not in favour of following any guidelines, as they perceived that the practice in Sudan does not allow implementation of guidelines. Conclusion: The prescribers in Sudan had to rely on guidelines made in foreign countries if they want to get the benefit of evidence-based medicine to their patients, but they had to find a way to adapt these guidelines to their patients and to the health care system they are working within. However, it is not known if this adaptation of foreign guidelines is providing the benefits intended or is risking evidence-based medicine.

KW - cardiology

KW - doctors

KW - guidelines

KW - health care system

KW - prescribing

KW - Sudan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044439508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jep.12746

DO - 10.1111/jep.12746

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044439508

VL - 24

SP - 127

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinial Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinial Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 1

ER -