Up or down? Capital income taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom

Vito Polito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that the Effective Marginal Tax Rate (EMTR) on income from capital has increased considerably in both the United States and the United Kingdom during 1982–2005. The corporate tax literature predicts however that the EMTR should fall over time due to increasing international capital mobility and higher tax competition between governments. This paper argues that this inconsistency can be explained by the fact that EMTRs are currently computed from versions of the neoclassical investment model that omit deferred tax constraints faced by firms investing in both the United States and the United Kingdom.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-82
Number of pages34
JournalFinanzarchiv : Public Finance Analysis
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Capital income taxation
Marginal tax rate
Investing
Deferred taxes
Tax competition
Empirical evidence
Inconsistency
International capital mobility
Corporate tax
Government
Income

Cite this

Up or down? Capital income taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom. / Polito, Vito.

In: Finanzarchiv : Public Finance Analysis, Vol. 68, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 48-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccb004cb7c8b4a40b6199f48d7c901ac,
title = "Up or down? Capital income taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Empirical evidence suggests that the Effective Marginal Tax Rate (EMTR) on income from capital has increased considerably in both the United States and the United Kingdom during 1982–2005. The corporate tax literature predicts however that the EMTR should fall over time due to increasing international capital mobility and higher tax competition between governments. This paper argues that this inconsistency can be explained by the fact that EMTRs are currently computed from versions of the neoclassical investment model that omit deferred tax constraints faced by firms investing in both the United States and the United Kingdom.",
author = "Vito Polito",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1628/001522112X632014",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "48--82",
journal = "Finanzarchiv : Public Finance Analysis",
issn = "0015-2218",
publisher = "JCB Mohr",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Up or down? Capital income taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom

AU - Polito, Vito

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Empirical evidence suggests that the Effective Marginal Tax Rate (EMTR) on income from capital has increased considerably in both the United States and the United Kingdom during 1982–2005. The corporate tax literature predicts however that the EMTR should fall over time due to increasing international capital mobility and higher tax competition between governments. This paper argues that this inconsistency can be explained by the fact that EMTRs are currently computed from versions of the neoclassical investment model that omit deferred tax constraints faced by firms investing in both the United States and the United Kingdom.

AB - Empirical evidence suggests that the Effective Marginal Tax Rate (EMTR) on income from capital has increased considerably in both the United States and the United Kingdom during 1982–2005. The corporate tax literature predicts however that the EMTR should fall over time due to increasing international capital mobility and higher tax competition between governments. This paper argues that this inconsistency can be explained by the fact that EMTRs are currently computed from versions of the neoclassical investment model that omit deferred tax constraints faced by firms investing in both the United States and the United Kingdom.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858437104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/001522112X632014

U2 - 10.1628/001522112X632014

DO - 10.1628/001522112X632014

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 48

EP - 82

JO - Finanzarchiv : Public Finance Analysis

JF - Finanzarchiv : Public Finance Analysis

SN - 0015-2218

IS - 1

ER -