Universal Credit

assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality

Jane Millar, Fran Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
123 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Universal Credit is a major change in the UK’s social security system which will affect around eight million households by replacing six existing means-tested benefits and tax credits with a single benefit, based on income, assets and circumstances, and paid monthly. Much commentary about Universal Credit has supported the principle but raised concerns about delivery. This consensus about the principles and the focus on delivery have resulted in less attention being paid to key policy choices informing the design. This article examines two aspects of the design of Universal Credit: the aim to make Universal Credit as much ‘like work’ as possible; and the architecture of the means test. The focus here is the gap between the assumptions underlying the design of Universal Credit on the one hand and the research evidence about life on a low income, and in low-waged and often insecure employment, on the other. Finally, we discuss the most significant contradiction between the ‘transformational’ aim for Universal Credit, to help people achieve greater ‘independence’ from the state, and the realities of deepening and widening control of claimants’ lives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-182
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Volume16
Issue number2
Early online date10 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

virtual reality
credit
social security
taxes
assets
low income
income
evidence

Keywords

  • universal credit
  • implementation
  • means testing
  • behaviour

Cite this

Universal Credit : assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality. / Millar, Jane; Bennett, Fran.

In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, 30.04.2017, p. 169-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2657defc2a8d492e9ba1d4ab6f94cb97,
title = "Universal Credit: assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality",
abstract = "Universal Credit is a major change in the UK’s social security system which will affect around eight million households by replacing six existing means-tested benefits and tax credits with a single benefit, based on income, assets and circumstances, and paid monthly. Much commentary about Universal Credit has supported the principle but raised concerns about delivery. This consensus about the principles and the focus on delivery have resulted in less attention being paid to key policy choices informing the design. This article examines two aspects of the design of Universal Credit: the aim to make Universal Credit as much ‘like work’ as possible; and the architecture of the means test. The focus here is the gap between the assumptions underlying the design of Universal Credit on the one hand and the research evidence about life on a low income, and in low-waged and often insecure employment, on the other. Finally, we discuss the most significant contradiction between the ‘transformational’ aim for Universal Credit, to help people achieve greater ‘independence’ from the state, and the realities of deepening and widening control of claimants’ lives.",
keywords = "universal credit, implementation, means testing, behaviour",
author = "Jane Millar and Fran Bennett",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1017/S1474746416000154",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "169--182",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1474-7464",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universal Credit

T2 - assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality

AU - Millar, Jane

AU - Bennett, Fran

PY - 2017/4/30

Y1 - 2017/4/30

N2 - Universal Credit is a major change in the UK’s social security system which will affect around eight million households by replacing six existing means-tested benefits and tax credits with a single benefit, based on income, assets and circumstances, and paid monthly. Much commentary about Universal Credit has supported the principle but raised concerns about delivery. This consensus about the principles and the focus on delivery have resulted in less attention being paid to key policy choices informing the design. This article examines two aspects of the design of Universal Credit: the aim to make Universal Credit as much ‘like work’ as possible; and the architecture of the means test. The focus here is the gap between the assumptions underlying the design of Universal Credit on the one hand and the research evidence about life on a low income, and in low-waged and often insecure employment, on the other. Finally, we discuss the most significant contradiction between the ‘transformational’ aim for Universal Credit, to help people achieve greater ‘independence’ from the state, and the realities of deepening and widening control of claimants’ lives.

AB - Universal Credit is a major change in the UK’s social security system which will affect around eight million households by replacing six existing means-tested benefits and tax credits with a single benefit, based on income, assets and circumstances, and paid monthly. Much commentary about Universal Credit has supported the principle but raised concerns about delivery. This consensus about the principles and the focus on delivery have resulted in less attention being paid to key policy choices informing the design. This article examines two aspects of the design of Universal Credit: the aim to make Universal Credit as much ‘like work’ as possible; and the architecture of the means test. The focus here is the gap between the assumptions underlying the design of Universal Credit on the one hand and the research evidence about life on a low income, and in low-waged and often insecure employment, on the other. Finally, we discuss the most significant contradiction between the ‘transformational’ aim for Universal Credit, to help people achieve greater ‘independence’ from the state, and the realities of deepening and widening control of claimants’ lives.

KW - universal credit

KW - implementation

KW - means testing

KW - behaviour

U2 - 10.1017/S1474746416000154

DO - 10.1017/S1474746416000154

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 169

EP - 182

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1474-7464

IS - 2

ER -