### Abstract

Language | English |
---|---|

Title of host publication | Intelligent Computer Mathematics: 16th Symposium, Calculemus 2009, 8th International Conference, MKM 2009 |

Editors | J Carette, L Dixon, C Sacerdoti Coen, S M Watt |

Place of Publication | Berlin |

Publisher | Springer |

Pages | 263-278 |

Number of pages | 16 |

Volume | 5625/2 |

ISBN (Print) | 978-3-642-02613-3 |

DOIs | |

Status | Published - 2009 |

Event | 8th International Conference on Mathematical Knowledge Management (MKM 2009) - Grand Bend, Ontario, Canada Duration: 10 Jul 2009 → 12 Jul 2009 |

### Conference

Conference | 8th International Conference on Mathematical Knowledge Management (MKM 2009) |
---|---|

Country | Canada |

City | Grand Bend, Ontario |

Period | 10/07/09 → 12/07/09 |

### Fingerprint

### Cite this

*Intelligent Computer Mathematics: 16th Symposium, Calculemus 2009, 8th International Conference, MKM 2009*(Vol. 5625/2, pp. 263-278). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02614-0_23

**Unifying Math Ontologies: A tale of two standards.** / Davenport, James H; Kohlhase, Michael.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

*Intelligent Computer Mathematics: 16th Symposium, Calculemus 2009, 8th International Conference, MKM 2009.*vol. 5625/2, Springer, Berlin, pp. 263-278, 8th International Conference on Mathematical Knowledge Management (MKM 2009), Grand Bend, Ontario, Canada, 10/07/09. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02614-0_23

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Unifying Math Ontologies: A tale of two standards

AU - Davenport, James H

AU - Kohlhase, Michael

N1 - Proceedings of the 16th Symposium, Calculemus 2009, 8th International Conference, MKM 2009, Held as Part of CICM 2009, Grand Bend, Canada, July 6-12, 2009 ID number: 5625/2009

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - One of the fundamental and seemingly simple aims of mathematical knowledge management (MKM) is to develop and standardize formats that allow to “represent the meaning of the objects of mathematics”. The open formats OpenMath and MathML address this, but differ subtly in syntax, rigor, and structural viewpoints (notably over calculus). To avoid fragmentation and smooth out interoperability obstacles, effort is under way to align them into a joint format OpenMath/MathML 3. We illustrate the issues that come up in such an alignment by looking at three main areas: bound variables and conditions, calculus (which relates to the previous) and “lifted” n-ary operators.

AB - One of the fundamental and seemingly simple aims of mathematical knowledge management (MKM) is to develop and standardize formats that allow to “represent the meaning of the objects of mathematics”. The open formats OpenMath and MathML address this, but differ subtly in syntax, rigor, and structural viewpoints (notably over calculus). To avoid fragmentation and smooth out interoperability obstacles, effort is under way to align them into a joint format OpenMath/MathML 3. We illustrate the issues that come up in such an alignment by looking at three main areas: bound variables and conditions, calculus (which relates to the previous) and “lifted” n-ary operators.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02614-0_23

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-02614-0_23

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-02614-0_23

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-642-02613-3

VL - 5625/2

SP - 263

EP - 278

BT - Intelligent Computer Mathematics: 16th Symposium, Calculemus 2009, 8th International Conference, MKM 2009

A2 - Carette, J

A2 - Dixon, L

A2 - Sacerdoti Coen, C

A2 - Watt, S M

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -