Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design

Marcelo Ferioli, Elies A Dekoninck, Stephen Culley, Benoit Roussel, Jean Renaud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a study that analyses the activity of creative idea evaluation in the early stages of the New Product Development (NPD) process. The focus of this study is on the first evaluation of ideas carried out just after the idea generation phase, which means the very rapid preliminary screening of ideas, normally done by experts. This work was undertaken by analysing in detail the activities of professional design experts who evaluate creative design ideas or concepts in a company. The study shows that there are two distinct stages in their evaluation. The first one is based on the underlying judgement, effectively a technical feasibility filter, using criteria of quite an objective nature. The second one is based upon Subjective Criteria (SC) and interestingly on just a basic 'feeling' or instinct. The research also shows that generally experts spend more time with ideas that will be accepted than ones that will end up rejected. In addition the study indicates that long idea-evaluation sessions are not very beneficial. The data shows a distinct difference in the mindset of the participants after an hour and many more ideas were rejected. This research suggests that good ideas may have been excluded or lost due to the duration of the session.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-83
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Product Development
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date1 Aug 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Product development
Screening
Industry
Evaluation

Cite this

Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design. / Ferioli, Marcelo; Dekoninck, Elies A; Culley, Stephen; Roussel, Benoit; Renaud, Jean.

In: International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010, p. 67-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0194652ea24403ab0a87ad8e576edb2,
title = "Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design",
abstract = "This paper presents a study that analyses the activity of creative idea evaluation in the early stages of the New Product Development (NPD) process. The focus of this study is on the first evaluation of ideas carried out just after the idea generation phase, which means the very rapid preliminary screening of ideas, normally done by experts. This work was undertaken by analysing in detail the activities of professional design experts who evaluate creative design ideas or concepts in a company. The study shows that there are two distinct stages in their evaluation. The first one is based on the underlying judgement, effectively a technical feasibility filter, using criteria of quite an objective nature. The second one is based upon Subjective Criteria (SC) and interestingly on just a basic 'feeling' or instinct. The research also shows that generally experts spend more time with ideas that will be accepted than ones that will end up rejected. In addition the study indicates that long idea-evaluation sessions are not very beneficial. The data shows a distinct difference in the mindset of the participants after an hour and many more ideas were rejected. This research suggests that good ideas may have been excluded or lost due to the duration of the session.",
author = "Marcelo Ferioli and Dekoninck, {Elies A} and Stephen Culley and Benoit Roussel and Jean Renaud",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1504/IJPD.2010.034313",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "67--83",
journal = "International Journal of Product Development",
issn = "1477-9056",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design

AU - Ferioli, Marcelo

AU - Dekoninck, Elies A

AU - Culley, Stephen

AU - Roussel, Benoit

AU - Renaud, Jean

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper presents a study that analyses the activity of creative idea evaluation in the early stages of the New Product Development (NPD) process. The focus of this study is on the first evaluation of ideas carried out just after the idea generation phase, which means the very rapid preliminary screening of ideas, normally done by experts. This work was undertaken by analysing in detail the activities of professional design experts who evaluate creative design ideas or concepts in a company. The study shows that there are two distinct stages in their evaluation. The first one is based on the underlying judgement, effectively a technical feasibility filter, using criteria of quite an objective nature. The second one is based upon Subjective Criteria (SC) and interestingly on just a basic 'feeling' or instinct. The research also shows that generally experts spend more time with ideas that will be accepted than ones that will end up rejected. In addition the study indicates that long idea-evaluation sessions are not very beneficial. The data shows a distinct difference in the mindset of the participants after an hour and many more ideas were rejected. This research suggests that good ideas may have been excluded or lost due to the duration of the session.

AB - This paper presents a study that analyses the activity of creative idea evaluation in the early stages of the New Product Development (NPD) process. The focus of this study is on the first evaluation of ideas carried out just after the idea generation phase, which means the very rapid preliminary screening of ideas, normally done by experts. This work was undertaken by analysing in detail the activities of professional design experts who evaluate creative design ideas or concepts in a company. The study shows that there are two distinct stages in their evaluation. The first one is based on the underlying judgement, effectively a technical feasibility filter, using criteria of quite an objective nature. The second one is based upon Subjective Criteria (SC) and interestingly on just a basic 'feeling' or instinct. The research also shows that generally experts spend more time with ideas that will be accepted than ones that will end up rejected. In addition the study indicates that long idea-evaluation sessions are not very beneficial. The data shows a distinct difference in the mindset of the participants after an hour and many more ideas were rejected. This research suggests that good ideas may have been excluded or lost due to the duration of the session.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955186220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2010.034313

U2 - 10.1504/IJPD.2010.034313

DO - 10.1504/IJPD.2010.034313

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 67

EP - 83

JO - International Journal of Product Development

JF - International Journal of Product Development

SN - 1477-9056

IS - 1

ER -