Understanding preferences in experience-based choice

a study of cognition in the "Wild"

Claire McAndrew, Julie Gore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to improve our understanding of preferences in experienced-based choice. Positioned within the framework of naturalistic decision making, this article responds to the recent call to complement the examination of experience-based choice with studies of cognition in the “wild.” We document an exploratory field study that uses applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) to examine financial day traders’ preferences. Providing real-world examples, our study illustrates how day traders construct their understanding of gains relative to losses and emphasizes the relevance of prospect theory for understanding the asymmetry of human choice. The fourfold pattern of preferences as studied in the wild is risk seeking for medium- and high-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability losses, and risk averse for medium- and high-probability losses. Our results differ from the fourfold pattern of preferences exhibited by experience-based choice when studied in the laboratory. The implications of this work for prospect theory and the distinction between “experience through learning” and “experience through professional training” are discussed alongside the merits of the ACTA technique for professional expert domain-based knowledge elicitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-197
JournalJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date2 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Cognition
Knowledge acquisition
Decision Making
Decision making
Learning

Cite this

Understanding preferences in experience-based choice : a study of cognition in the "Wild". / McAndrew, Claire; Gore, Julie.

In: Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 179-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83950e1bd98b431598192351c66ba0ef,
title = "Understanding preferences in experience-based choice: a study of cognition in the {"}Wild{"}",
abstract = "The objective of this article is to improve our understanding of preferences in experienced-based choice. Positioned within the framework of naturalistic decision making, this article responds to the recent call to complement the examination of experience-based choice with studies of cognition in the “wild.” We document an exploratory field study that uses applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) to examine financial day traders’ preferences. Providing real-world examples, our study illustrates how day traders construct their understanding of gains relative to losses and emphasizes the relevance of prospect theory for understanding the asymmetry of human choice. The fourfold pattern of preferences as studied in the wild is risk seeking for medium- and high-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability losses, and risk averse for medium- and high-probability losses. Our results differ from the fourfold pattern of preferences exhibited by experience-based choice when studied in the laboratory. The implications of this work for prospect theory and the distinction between “experience through learning” and “experience through professional training” are discussed alongside the merits of the ACTA technique for professional expert domain-based knowledge elicitation.",
author = "Claire McAndrew and Julie Gore",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1555343412463922",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "179--197",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making",
issn = "1555-3434",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding preferences in experience-based choice

T2 - a study of cognition in the "Wild"

AU - McAndrew, Claire

AU - Gore, Julie

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - The objective of this article is to improve our understanding of preferences in experienced-based choice. Positioned within the framework of naturalistic decision making, this article responds to the recent call to complement the examination of experience-based choice with studies of cognition in the “wild.” We document an exploratory field study that uses applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) to examine financial day traders’ preferences. Providing real-world examples, our study illustrates how day traders construct their understanding of gains relative to losses and emphasizes the relevance of prospect theory for understanding the asymmetry of human choice. The fourfold pattern of preferences as studied in the wild is risk seeking for medium- and high-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability losses, and risk averse for medium- and high-probability losses. Our results differ from the fourfold pattern of preferences exhibited by experience-based choice when studied in the laboratory. The implications of this work for prospect theory and the distinction between “experience through learning” and “experience through professional training” are discussed alongside the merits of the ACTA technique for professional expert domain-based knowledge elicitation.

AB - The objective of this article is to improve our understanding of preferences in experienced-based choice. Positioned within the framework of naturalistic decision making, this article responds to the recent call to complement the examination of experience-based choice with studies of cognition in the “wild.” We document an exploratory field study that uses applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA) to examine financial day traders’ preferences. Providing real-world examples, our study illustrates how day traders construct their understanding of gains relative to losses and emphasizes the relevance of prospect theory for understanding the asymmetry of human choice. The fourfold pattern of preferences as studied in the wild is risk seeking for medium- and high-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability gains, risk averse for small-probability losses, and risk averse for medium- and high-probability losses. Our results differ from the fourfold pattern of preferences exhibited by experience-based choice when studied in the laboratory. The implications of this work for prospect theory and the distinction between “experience through learning” and “experience through professional training” are discussed alongside the merits of the ACTA technique for professional expert domain-based knowledge elicitation.

UR - http://edm.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/1555343412463922

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555343412463922

U2 - 10.1177/1555343412463922

DO - 10.1177/1555343412463922

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 179

EP - 197

JO - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

JF - Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

SN - 1555-3434

IS - 2

ER -