UK and Italian EIA systems: a comparative study on management practice and performance in the construction industry

Andrea Bassi, Robert Howard, Davide Geneletti, Simone Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

This study evaluates and contrasts the management practice and the performance that characterise Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in Italy and in the UK. The methodology relies on the investigation of six carefully selected case studies, critically reviewed by referring to EIA and project design information, as well as collecting the opinion of key project participants. The study focuses on the construction industry and on specific key sectors like infrastructure for transport and renewable energy and commercial and tourism development. A main term of reference for the analyses has been established by critically reviewing international literature so as to outline common good practice, requirements for the enhancement of sustainability principles and typically incurred drawbacks. The proposed approach enhances transfer of knowledge and of experiences between the analyzed contexts and allows the provision of guidelines for practitioners. Distinctive differences between the UK and the Italian EIA systems have been detected for pivotal phases and elements of EIA, like screening, scoping, analysis of alternatives and of potential impacts, definition of mitigation strategies, review, decision making, public participation and follow up.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-11
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

construction industry
environmental impact
management
performance
common good
renewable energy
Italy
Tourism
sustainability
infrastructure
decision making
participation
methodology
knowledge
experience

Cite this

UK and Italian EIA systems : a comparative study on management practice and performance in the construction industry. / Bassi, Andrea; Howard, Robert; Geneletti, Davide; Ferrari, Simone.

In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bassi, Andrea ; Howard, Robert ; Geneletti, Davide ; Ferrari, Simone. / UK and Italian EIA systems : a comparative study on management practice and performance in the construction industry. In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 1-11
@article{7206c30e134b4bbe96fea13f4e83817a,
title = "UK and Italian EIA systems: a comparative study on management practice and performance in the construction industry",
abstract = "This study evaluates and contrasts the management practice and the performance that characterise Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in Italy and in the UK. The methodology relies on the investigation of six carefully selected case studies, critically reviewed by referring to EIA and project design information, as well as collecting the opinion of key project participants. The study focuses on the construction industry and on specific key sectors like infrastructure for transport and renewable energy and commercial and tourism development. A main term of reference for the analyses has been established by critically reviewing international literature so as to outline common good practice, requirements for the enhancement of sustainability principles and typically incurred drawbacks. The proposed approach enhances transfer of knowledge and of experiences between the analyzed contexts and allows the provision of guidelines for practitioners. Distinctive differences between the UK and the Italian EIA systems have been detected for pivotal phases and elements of EIA, like screening, scoping, analysis of alternatives and of potential impacts, definition of mitigation strategies, review, decision making, public participation and follow up.",
author = "Andrea Bassi and Robert Howard and Davide Geneletti and Simone Ferrari",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Environmental Impact Assessment Review",
issn = "0195-9255",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - UK and Italian EIA systems

T2 - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

AU - Bassi,Andrea

AU - Howard,Robert

AU - Geneletti,Davide

AU - Ferrari,Simone

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - This study evaluates and contrasts the management practice and the performance that characterise Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in Italy and in the UK. The methodology relies on the investigation of six carefully selected case studies, critically reviewed by referring to EIA and project design information, as well as collecting the opinion of key project participants. The study focuses on the construction industry and on specific key sectors like infrastructure for transport and renewable energy and commercial and tourism development. A main term of reference for the analyses has been established by critically reviewing international literature so as to outline common good practice, requirements for the enhancement of sustainability principles and typically incurred drawbacks. The proposed approach enhances transfer of knowledge and of experiences between the analyzed contexts and allows the provision of guidelines for practitioners. Distinctive differences between the UK and the Italian EIA systems have been detected for pivotal phases and elements of EIA, like screening, scoping, analysis of alternatives and of potential impacts, definition of mitigation strategies, review, decision making, public participation and follow up.

AB - This study evaluates and contrasts the management practice and the performance that characterise Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in Italy and in the UK. The methodology relies on the investigation of six carefully selected case studies, critically reviewed by referring to EIA and project design information, as well as collecting the opinion of key project participants. The study focuses on the construction industry and on specific key sectors like infrastructure for transport and renewable energy and commercial and tourism development. A main term of reference for the analyses has been established by critically reviewing international literature so as to outline common good practice, requirements for the enhancement of sustainability principles and typically incurred drawbacks. The proposed approach enhances transfer of knowledge and of experiences between the analyzed contexts and allows the provision of guidelines for practitioners. Distinctive differences between the UK and the Italian EIA systems have been detected for pivotal phases and elements of EIA, like screening, scoping, analysis of alternatives and of potential impacts, definition of mitigation strategies, review, decision making, public participation and follow up.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855365648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.002

U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

SN - 0195-9255

IS - 4

ER -