Two studies examining argumentation in asynchronous computer mediated communication

Richard Joiner, S Jones, J Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Asynchronous computer mediated communication (CMC) would seem to be an ideal medium for supporting development in student argumentation. This paper investigates this assumption through two studies. The first study compared asynchronous CMC with face-to-face discussions. The transactional and strategic level of the argumentation (i.e. measures of argumentation quality) observed in face-to-face discussions was higher than that observed in CMC discussions; however, this difference was not reflected in the students' subsequent level of argumentation. The second study compared a CMC discussion consisting of students from the same degree programme with those from different degree programmes. Students from the same degree programme participated more in the discussion than students from different degree programmes, but the structural quality of the argumentation was higher for students from different degree programmes. The implications of these findings for the methods used to assess the quality of argumentation are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-255
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Research and Method in Education
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Two studies examining argumentation in asynchronous computer mediated communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this