Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review

Faith Martin, L Camfield, K Rodham, P Kliempt, D Ruta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)705-715
Number of pages11
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Cognition
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review. / Martin, Faith; Camfield, L; Rodham, K; Kliempt, P; Ruta, D.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, p. 705-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{30358a4167d3403ca7a53b7c800ff798,
title = "Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review",
abstract = "The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.",
author = "Faith Martin and L Camfield and K Rodham and P Kliempt and D Ruta",
note = "ID number: ISI:000245176100015",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "705--715",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review

AU - Martin, Faith

AU - Camfield, L

AU - Rodham, K

AU - Kliempt, P

AU - Ruta, D

N1 - ID number: ISI:000245176100015

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.

AB - The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6

DO - 10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 705

EP - 715

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 4

ER -