Transparency in practice

Evidence from “verification analyses” issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012-2015

Piotr Ozieranski, Olga Löblová, Natalia Nicholls, Marcell Csanádi, Zoltan Kalo, Martin McKee, Lawrence King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Transparency is recognised to be a key underpinning of the work of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, yet it has only recently become a subject of systematic inquiry. We contribute to this research field by considering the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol). We situate the AHTAPol in a broader context by comparing it with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. To this end, we analyse all 332 assessment reports, called Verification Analyses, that the AHTAPol issued from 2012 to 2015, and a stratified sample of 22 Evidence Review Group reports published by NICE in the same period. Overall, by increasingly presenting its key conclusions in assessment reports the AHTAPol has reached the transparency standards set out by NICE in transparency of HTA outputs. The AHTAPol is more transparent than NICE in certain aspects of the HTA process, such as providing rationales for redacting assessment reports and providing summaries of expert opinions. Nevertheless, it is less transparent in other areas of the HTA process, such as including information on expert conflicts of interest. Our findings have important implications for understanding HTA in Poland and more broadly. We use them to formulate recommendations for policymakers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-204
JournalHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date8 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology Assessment
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Delivery of Health Care
Conflict of Interest
Expert Testimony
Poland
England
Research

Cite this

Transparency in practice : Evidence from “verification analyses” issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012-2015. / Ozieranski, Piotr; Löblová, Olga; Nicholls, Natalia; Csanádi, Marcell; Kalo, Zoltan; McKee, Martin; King, Lawrence.

In: Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 182-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozieranski, Piotr ; Löblová, Olga ; Nicholls, Natalia ; Csanádi, Marcell ; Kalo, Zoltan ; McKee, Martin ; King, Lawrence. / Transparency in practice : Evidence from “verification analyses” issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012-2015. In: Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 182-204.
@article{378ca8e5bce04bee95e936892f47be07,
title = "Transparency in practice: Evidence from “verification analyses” issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012-2015",
abstract = "Transparency is recognised to be a key underpinning of the work of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, yet it has only recently become a subject of systematic inquiry. We contribute to this research field by considering the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol). We situate the AHTAPol in a broader context by comparing it with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. To this end, we analyse all 332 assessment reports, called Verification Analyses, that the AHTAPol issued from 2012 to 2015, and a stratified sample of 22 Evidence Review Group reports published by NICE in the same period. Overall, by increasingly presenting its key conclusions in assessment reports the AHTAPol has reached the transparency standards set out by NICE in transparency of HTA outputs. The AHTAPol is more transparent than NICE in certain aspects of the HTA process, such as providing rationales for redacting assessment reports and providing summaries of expert opinions. Nevertheless, it is less transparent in other areas of the HTA process, such as including information on expert conflicts of interest. Our findings have important implications for understanding HTA in Poland and more broadly. We use them to formulate recommendations for policymakers.",
author = "Piotr Ozieranski and Olga L{\"o}blov{\'a} and Natalia Nicholls and Marcell Csan{\'a}di and Zoltan Kalo and Martin McKee and Lawrence King",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1744133117000342",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "182--204",
journal = "Health Economics, Policy and Law",
issn = "1744-1331",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency in practice

T2 - Evidence from “verification analyses” issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment in 2012-2015

AU - Ozieranski, Piotr

AU - Löblová, Olga

AU - Nicholls, Natalia

AU - Csanádi, Marcell

AU - Kalo, Zoltan

AU - McKee, Martin

AU - King, Lawrence

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Transparency is recognised to be a key underpinning of the work of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, yet it has only recently become a subject of systematic inquiry. We contribute to this research field by considering the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol). We situate the AHTAPol in a broader context by comparing it with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. To this end, we analyse all 332 assessment reports, called Verification Analyses, that the AHTAPol issued from 2012 to 2015, and a stratified sample of 22 Evidence Review Group reports published by NICE in the same period. Overall, by increasingly presenting its key conclusions in assessment reports the AHTAPol has reached the transparency standards set out by NICE in transparency of HTA outputs. The AHTAPol is more transparent than NICE in certain aspects of the HTA process, such as providing rationales for redacting assessment reports and providing summaries of expert opinions. Nevertheless, it is less transparent in other areas of the HTA process, such as including information on expert conflicts of interest. Our findings have important implications for understanding HTA in Poland and more broadly. We use them to formulate recommendations for policymakers.

AB - Transparency is recognised to be a key underpinning of the work of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, yet it has only recently become a subject of systematic inquiry. We contribute to this research field by considering the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AHTAPol). We situate the AHTAPol in a broader context by comparing it with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. To this end, we analyse all 332 assessment reports, called Verification Analyses, that the AHTAPol issued from 2012 to 2015, and a stratified sample of 22 Evidence Review Group reports published by NICE in the same period. Overall, by increasingly presenting its key conclusions in assessment reports the AHTAPol has reached the transparency standards set out by NICE in transparency of HTA outputs. The AHTAPol is more transparent than NICE in certain aspects of the HTA process, such as providing rationales for redacting assessment reports and providing summaries of expert opinions. Nevertheless, it is less transparent in other areas of the HTA process, such as including information on expert conflicts of interest. Our findings have important implications for understanding HTA in Poland and more broadly. We use them to formulate recommendations for policymakers.

U2 - 10.1017/S1744133117000342

DO - 10.1017/S1744133117000342

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 182

EP - 204

JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law

JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law

SN - 1744-1331

IS - 2

ER -