Abstract
This article examines how public inquiries come into being through a detailed analysis of the pre-inquiry phase of the UK COVID-19 Inquiry. We focus on two key points of contestation—around the timing of the inquiry and its terms of reference—and suggest that what is at stake during the pre-stage of an inquiry is its ontological and epistemological orientation. Our analysis traces the emergence of two distinct positions during this phase: a grassroots position (conceiving of the inquiry as a response to the experience of collective grief) and an official position (conceiving of the inquiry as a means of learning lessons). Particular attention is given to the latter position and what it reveals about the rhetorical function of transparency in confirming a political commitment to institutional accountability, at the same time as working towards a particular conception of the inquiry as a practical task, expansive in remit, and future oriented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 453-477 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | British Politics |
| Volume | 20 |
| Early online date | 29 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Oct 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.Keywords
- Accountability
- COVID-19
- Grief activism
- Public inquiry
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transparency in action or political fiction? The pre-inquiry phase of the UK COVID-19 Inquiry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS