Abstract
Debates over localisation in transitional justice and peacebuilding have been characterised by the assumption that more equitable relationships between local and international actors allow for more effective and just interventions. Critical scholarship has in turn cautioned over the use of reified conceptions of the ‘local’ and ‘international’, emphasising each as contested sites. Through a network analysis of transitional justice event data in Cambodia, we ask: what are the roles and influence of Cambodian actors, and what might their positions tell us about the relationships between international and local groups? We find that event data shows strong local representation within the transitional justice community. However, representation is not synonymous with influence. Our data demonstrates an uneven distribution of network positions within both local and international groupings. This illustrates the need for greater attention to the role of individual biographies that advantage certain individuals to shape transitional justice interventions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 158-176 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journal of Peacebuilding & Development |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Aug 2023 |
Bibliographical note
FundingThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Keywords
- Cambodia
- knowledge production
- social network analysis
- transitional justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Political Science and International Relations
- Safety Research