Abstract
Ensuring global food security while halting ecosystem degradation is arguably one of the most fundamental current challenges. As a key component of fertilisers for which there is no substitute, phosphorus plays a central role in this challenge. Food production systems are critically vulnerable to phosphorus supply disruptions and price spikes, while high phosphorus-inefficiencies drive the greatest global threat to waters through diffuse pollution. Transformation to a more phosphorus sustainable and efficient system inevitably necessitates transition at the farm level, leading to the critical question of whether farmers are ready for such transition. This paper examines the relationship between the farmers’ perceived adaptive capacity and farm-level actions that can enable a positive phosphorus transition. We innovatively apply a second-generation psycho-social mobilisation approach to adaptive capacity (based on personal experience, place attachment, competing concerns, household dynamics, and risk attitudes) and establish its relation to an extended framework of phosphorus stewardship action, using Structural Equation Modelling in a UK-wide survey. Our results confirm that the second-generation approach provides a more nuanced approximation to the understanding of farmers’ adaptive capacity than traditional (first-generation) approaches (five capitals: human, natural, physical, financial, and social), allowing a more dynamic understanding and a more robust assessment of adaptive capacity. Beyond our specific results for the UK (which demonstrate relatively high levels of farmers’ readiness to adapt and promising predisposition to do so, if supported), our research illustrates how this framework can be used to identify priority actions to enhance farmers’ uptake of phosphorus stewardship actions more generally.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103930 |
Journal | Environmental Science and Policy |
Volume | 162 |
Early online date | 28 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to all survey respondents, as well as to project partners contributing to the background of this research, especially Christopher Lyon. This research was evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Leeds (LTSEE-093).Funding
This research forms part of the RePhoKUs project (The role of Phosphorus in the Resilience and Sustainability of the UK food system), funded by the Global Food Security\u2019s \u2018Resilience of the UK Food System Programme\u2019 with the UK\u2019s Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Scottish Government (Grant No. BB/R005842/1). This paper was also possible thanks to funding of the project RecaP: Capture, recycling and societal management of phosphorus in the environment, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 956454. This paper reflects only the authors\u2019 views and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This research forms part of the RePhoKUs project (The role of Phosphorus in the Resilience and Sustainability of the UK food system), funded by the Global Food Security's \u2018Resilience of the UK Food System Programme\u2019 with the UK's Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Scottish Government (Grant No. BB/R005842/1). This paper was also possible thanks to funding of the project RecaP: Capture, recycling and societal management of phosphorus in the environment, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 956454. This paper reflects only the authors\u2019 views and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The authors are very grateful to all survey respondents, as well as to project partners contributing to the background of this research, especially Christopher Lyon. This research was evaluated and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Leeds (LTSEE-093).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Natural Environment Research Council | |
Economic and Social Research Council | |
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council | |
European Commission | |
Scottish Government | BB/R005842/1 |
Scottish Government | |
Horizon 2020 | 956454 |
Horizon 2020 | |
University of Leeds | LTSEE-093 |
University of Leeds |
Keywords
- Adaptive capacity
- Diffuse pollution
- Fertilisers
- Structural equation modelling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law