Trans-Atlantic Death Methods

Disciplinarity shared and challenged by a common language

Candi K Cann, John Troyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The different countries that death and dying researchers reside within often shape not only research agendas but also research methodologies. The United Kingdom and the United States are two examples of countries that share a common language and intellectual history but their discourses on death have been very different. These differences are partly explained through cultural practices, and also government funding of research, definitions of death and end-of-life planning education. In this article, we argue that early death scholarship in the United States impacted death research and outcomes in both the US and the UK, but that recent scholarship in both countries has caused the two countries to diverge in two major areas: (1) the methodological approaches to death studies and (2) the educational training of medical and hospice personnel in direct contact with the dying. We argue that in order for death studies to fully benefit from trans-Atlantic dialogue on death, both countries need to move towards a more integrated trans-disciplinary model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-117
Number of pages13
JournalMortality: Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date21 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Language
death
language
dying
life planning
educational training
Hospices
history of ideas
Disciplinarity
Transatlantic
Common Language
transdisciplinary
hospice
Research
personnel
Research Design
History
funding
dialogue
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{ed72c6dd63994084ae1928146f166b41,
title = "Trans-Atlantic Death Methods: Disciplinarity shared and challenged by a common language",
abstract = "The different countries that death and dying researchers reside within often shape not only research agendas but also research methodologies. The United Kingdom and the United States are two examples of countries that share a common language and intellectual history but their discourses on death have been very different. These differences are partly explained through cultural practices, and also government funding of research, definitions of death and end-of-life planning education. In this article, we argue that early death scholarship in the United States impacted death research and outcomes in both the US and the UK, but that recent scholarship in both countries has caused the two countries to diverge in two major areas: (1) the methodological approaches to death studies and (2) the educational training of medical and hospice personnel in direct contact with the dying. We argue that in order for death studies to fully benefit from trans-Atlantic dialogue on death, both countries need to move towards a more integrated trans-disciplinary model.",
author = "Cann, {Candi K} and John Troyer",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/13576275.2017.1291601",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Mortality",
issn = "1357-6275",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trans-Atlantic Death Methods

T2 - Disciplinarity shared and challenged by a common language

AU - Cann, Candi K

AU - Troyer, John

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The different countries that death and dying researchers reside within often shape not only research agendas but also research methodologies. The United Kingdom and the United States are two examples of countries that share a common language and intellectual history but their discourses on death have been very different. These differences are partly explained through cultural practices, and also government funding of research, definitions of death and end-of-life planning education. In this article, we argue that early death scholarship in the United States impacted death research and outcomes in both the US and the UK, but that recent scholarship in both countries has caused the two countries to diverge in two major areas: (1) the methodological approaches to death studies and (2) the educational training of medical and hospice personnel in direct contact with the dying. We argue that in order for death studies to fully benefit from trans-Atlantic dialogue on death, both countries need to move towards a more integrated trans-disciplinary model.

AB - The different countries that death and dying researchers reside within often shape not only research agendas but also research methodologies. The United Kingdom and the United States are two examples of countries that share a common language and intellectual history but their discourses on death have been very different. These differences are partly explained through cultural practices, and also government funding of research, definitions of death and end-of-life planning education. In this article, we argue that early death scholarship in the United States impacted death research and outcomes in both the US and the UK, but that recent scholarship in both countries has caused the two countries to diverge in two major areas: (1) the methodological approaches to death studies and (2) the educational training of medical and hospice personnel in direct contact with the dying. We argue that in order for death studies to fully benefit from trans-Atlantic dialogue on death, both countries need to move towards a more integrated trans-disciplinary model.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2017.1291601

U2 - 10.1080/13576275.2017.1291601

DO - 10.1080/13576275.2017.1291601

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Mortality

JF - Mortality

SN - 1357-6275

IS - 2

ER -