Tracing Failure of Coral Reef Protection in Nonstate Market-Driven Governance

Michael J. Bloomfield, Philip Schleifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (SciVal)
131 Downloads (Pure)


Institutional failure remains an important blind spot in the private governance literature. In this article we argue that a focus on scope conditions alone cannot explain why some programs thrive while others cease to exist. Studying the now-defunct Marine Aquarium Council—a certification program for coral reef protection—we adopt an institutional-process approach to fill this gap. Our main points can be summarized in a two-step argument: First, we argue that the scope conditions of private governance are partly endogenous to these processes. Through making strategic decisions, private governance programs have a certain level of control over their environment, and thus over the scope conditions under which they operate. Second, initial choices often unfold path dependencies over time. By tracing the evolution of the Marine Aquarium Council, we illustrate the program’s “mission creep” and the “vicious cycle” of self-reinforcing activity that culminated in its failure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-146
Number of pages20
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Issue number4
Early online date29 Sept 2017
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017


  • Private governance, NSMD governance, certification, sustainability, institutional failure, path dependency


Dive into the research topics of 'Tracing Failure of Coral Reef Protection in Nonstate Market-Driven Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this