Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy

Benjamin J.A. Walker, Tim Kurz, Duncan Russel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
163 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a growing tendency for policy makers to frame climate change action in terms of non-climate benefits, raising important empirical questions regarding the utility of such approaches. Across three studies we explore whether (and when) non-climate frames can lead to greater support for climate policy relative to climate frames. In Study 1 we framed a car-use reduction policy in relation to climate change or public health and showed that non-climate frames can stimulate greater support for climate policy. Study 2 explored frame relevance as a potential boundary condition to the efficacy of non-climate frames. Study 3 found that attempts to frame climate policy in relation to non-climate issues that affect participants personally can fail if that issue is not seen as being sufficiently relevant. We suggest that non-climate frames can be an effective tool in stimulating support for climate policy, however greater consideration of the key mechanisms is required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)781-806
Number of pages26
JournalEnvironment and Behavior
Volume50
Issue number7
Early online date7 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

environmental policy
climate change
car use
public health
boundary condition
policy
public
climate

Cite this

Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy. / Walker, Benjamin J.A.; Kurz, Tim; Russel, Duncan.

In: Environment and Behavior, Vol. 50, No. 7, 01.08.2018, p. 781-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{151ccafc506d47f3a33ffa1a6859c4a9,
title = "Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy",
abstract = "There is a growing tendency for policy makers to frame climate change action in terms of non-climate benefits, raising important empirical questions regarding the utility of such approaches. Across three studies we explore whether (and when) non-climate frames can lead to greater support for climate policy relative to climate frames. In Study 1 we framed a car-use reduction policy in relation to climate change or public health and showed that non-climate frames can stimulate greater support for climate policy. Study 2 explored frame relevance as a potential boundary condition to the efficacy of non-climate frames. Study 3 found that attempts to frame climate policy in relation to non-climate issues that affect participants personally can fail if that issue is not seen as being sufficiently relevant. We suggest that non-climate frames can be an effective tool in stimulating support for climate policy, however greater consideration of the key mechanisms is required.",
author = "Walker, {Benjamin J.A.} and Tim Kurz and Duncan Russel",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0013916517713299",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "781--806",
journal = "Environment and Behavior",
issn = "0013-9165",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy

AU - Walker, Benjamin J.A.

AU - Kurz, Tim

AU - Russel, Duncan

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - There is a growing tendency for policy makers to frame climate change action in terms of non-climate benefits, raising important empirical questions regarding the utility of such approaches. Across three studies we explore whether (and when) non-climate frames can lead to greater support for climate policy relative to climate frames. In Study 1 we framed a car-use reduction policy in relation to climate change or public health and showed that non-climate frames can stimulate greater support for climate policy. Study 2 explored frame relevance as a potential boundary condition to the efficacy of non-climate frames. Study 3 found that attempts to frame climate policy in relation to non-climate issues that affect participants personally can fail if that issue is not seen as being sufficiently relevant. We suggest that non-climate frames can be an effective tool in stimulating support for climate policy, however greater consideration of the key mechanisms is required.

AB - There is a growing tendency for policy makers to frame climate change action in terms of non-climate benefits, raising important empirical questions regarding the utility of such approaches. Across three studies we explore whether (and when) non-climate frames can lead to greater support for climate policy relative to climate frames. In Study 1 we framed a car-use reduction policy in relation to climate change or public health and showed that non-climate frames can stimulate greater support for climate policy. Study 2 explored frame relevance as a potential boundary condition to the efficacy of non-climate frames. Study 3 found that attempts to frame climate policy in relation to non-climate issues that affect participants personally can fail if that issue is not seen as being sufficiently relevant. We suggest that non-climate frames can be an effective tool in stimulating support for climate policy, however greater consideration of the key mechanisms is required.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517713299

U2 - 10.1177/0013916517713299

DO - 10.1177/0013916517713299

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 781

EP - 806

JO - Environment and Behavior

JF - Environment and Behavior

SN - 0013-9165

IS - 7

ER -