Towards a sociology of institutional transparency: openness, deception, and the problem of public trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transparency has become the watchword of 21st-century liberal democracies. It refers to a project of opening up the state by providing online access to public sector data. This article puts forward a sociological critique of the transparency agenda and the purported relationship between institutional openness and public trust. Drawing upon Simmel’s work, the article argues that open government initiatives routinely prize visibility over intelligibility and ignore the communicative basis of trust. The result is a non-reciprocal form of openness that obscures more than it reveals. In making this point the article suggests that transparency embodies the ethos of a now-discredited mode of what Ezrahi calls ‘instrumental politics’, reliant on the idea that the state constitutes a ‘domain of plain public facts’. The article examines how alternative mechanisms for achieving government openness might better respond to the distinctive needs of citizens living in late modern societies.

LanguageEnglish
Pages416-430
Number of pages15
JournalSociology
Volume52
Issue number2
Early online date19 Jan 2017
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

transparency
sociology
twenty-first century
public sector
democracy
citizen
politics
society

Keywords

  • Deception
  • democracy
  • open government
  • public
  • transparency
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Towards a sociology of institutional transparency: openness, deception, and the problem of public trust. / Moore, Sarah.

In: Sociology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 416-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cec58453a0a54e2f8deddba71dc30ffc,
title = "Towards a sociology of institutional transparency: openness, deception, and the problem of public trust",
abstract = "Transparency has become the watchword of 21st-century liberal democracies. It refers to a project of opening up the state by providing online access to public sector data. This article puts forward a sociological critique of the transparency agenda and the purported relationship between institutional openness and public trust. Drawing upon Simmel’s work, the article argues that open government initiatives routinely prize visibility over intelligibility and ignore the communicative basis of trust. The result is a non-reciprocal form of openness that obscures more than it reveals. In making this point the article suggests that transparency embodies the ethos of a now-discredited mode of what Ezrahi calls ‘instrumental politics’, reliant on the idea that the state constitutes a ‘domain of plain public facts’. The article examines how alternative mechanisms for achieving government openness might better respond to the distinctive needs of citizens living in late modern societies.",
keywords = "Deception, democracy, open government, public, transparency, trust",
author = "Sarah Moore",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038038516686530",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "416--430",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a sociology of institutional transparency: openness, deception, and the problem of public trust

AU - Moore, Sarah

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Transparency has become the watchword of 21st-century liberal democracies. It refers to a project of opening up the state by providing online access to public sector data. This article puts forward a sociological critique of the transparency agenda and the purported relationship between institutional openness and public trust. Drawing upon Simmel’s work, the article argues that open government initiatives routinely prize visibility over intelligibility and ignore the communicative basis of trust. The result is a non-reciprocal form of openness that obscures more than it reveals. In making this point the article suggests that transparency embodies the ethos of a now-discredited mode of what Ezrahi calls ‘instrumental politics’, reliant on the idea that the state constitutes a ‘domain of plain public facts’. The article examines how alternative mechanisms for achieving government openness might better respond to the distinctive needs of citizens living in late modern societies.

AB - Transparency has become the watchword of 21st-century liberal democracies. It refers to a project of opening up the state by providing online access to public sector data. This article puts forward a sociological critique of the transparency agenda and the purported relationship between institutional openness and public trust. Drawing upon Simmel’s work, the article argues that open government initiatives routinely prize visibility over intelligibility and ignore the communicative basis of trust. The result is a non-reciprocal form of openness that obscures more than it reveals. In making this point the article suggests that transparency embodies the ethos of a now-discredited mode of what Ezrahi calls ‘instrumental politics’, reliant on the idea that the state constitutes a ‘domain of plain public facts’. The article examines how alternative mechanisms for achieving government openness might better respond to the distinctive needs of citizens living in late modern societies.

KW - Deception

KW - democracy

KW - open government

KW - public

KW - transparency

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042545866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0038038516686530

DO - 10.1177/0038038516686530

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 416

EP - 430

JO - Sociology

T2 - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 2

ER -