Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC

R. Heijungs, E. Settanni, J. Guinée

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: A widely used theory of the computational structure of life cycle assessment (LCA) has been available for more than a decade. The case of environmental life cycle cost (LCC) is still less clear: even the recent Code of Practice does not specify any formula to use. Methods: This paper does not aim to resolve all the issues at stake. But it aims to provide an explicit and transparent description of how to calculate the life cycle cost (in whatever way defined), and the value added across the life cycle. Results and discussion: The expressions obtained can be fed into the formulas for eco-efficiency, so that an explicit and reproducible eco-efficiency indicator can be calculated. Conclusions: The results are useful for developing life cycle sustainability analysis, combining LCA, LCC, and social LCA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1722-1733
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume18
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

life cycle analysis
life cycle
sustainability
cost

Cite this

Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC. / Heijungs, R.; Settanni, E.; Guinée, J.

In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 18, No. 9, 11.2013, p. 1722-1733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{971e6aa8f26e4ef3aaa353c319a35d66,
title = "Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC",
abstract = "Purpose: A widely used theory of the computational structure of life cycle assessment (LCA) has been available for more than a decade. The case of environmental life cycle cost (LCC) is still less clear: even the recent Code of Practice does not specify any formula to use. Methods: This paper does not aim to resolve all the issues at stake. But it aims to provide an explicit and transparent description of how to calculate the life cycle cost (in whatever way defined), and the value added across the life cycle. Results and discussion: The expressions obtained can be fed into the formulas for eco-efficiency, so that an explicit and reproducible eco-efficiency indicator can be calculated. Conclusions: The results are useful for developing life cycle sustainability analysis, combining LCA, LCC, and social LCA.",
author = "R. Heijungs and E. Settanni and J. Guin{\'e}e",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1722--1733",
journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
issn = "0948-3349",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC

AU - Heijungs, R.

AU - Settanni, E.

AU - Guinée, J.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Purpose: A widely used theory of the computational structure of life cycle assessment (LCA) has been available for more than a decade. The case of environmental life cycle cost (LCC) is still less clear: even the recent Code of Practice does not specify any formula to use. Methods: This paper does not aim to resolve all the issues at stake. But it aims to provide an explicit and transparent description of how to calculate the life cycle cost (in whatever way defined), and the value added across the life cycle. Results and discussion: The expressions obtained can be fed into the formulas for eco-efficiency, so that an explicit and reproducible eco-efficiency indicator can be calculated. Conclusions: The results are useful for developing life cycle sustainability analysis, combining LCA, LCC, and social LCA.

AB - Purpose: A widely used theory of the computational structure of life cycle assessment (LCA) has been available for more than a decade. The case of environmental life cycle cost (LCC) is still less clear: even the recent Code of Practice does not specify any formula to use. Methods: This paper does not aim to resolve all the issues at stake. But it aims to provide an explicit and transparent description of how to calculate the life cycle cost (in whatever way defined), and the value added across the life cycle. Results and discussion: The expressions obtained can be fed into the formulas for eco-efficiency, so that an explicit and reproducible eco-efficiency indicator can be calculated. Conclusions: The results are useful for developing life cycle sustainability analysis, combining LCA, LCC, and social LCA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863310981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4

DO - 10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1722

EP - 1733

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

SN - 0948-3349

IS - 9

ER -